• YUBNUB.NEWS
    Christiane Amanpour: Sorry For Saying Israeli Hostages Had it Better Than Gazans
    I'm not sure what CNN's Christiane Amanpour was thinking today. Even as the 20 living Israeli hostages were being reunited with their families after two years of captivity, starvation and sometimes torture,
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 3 Visualizações
  • YUBNUB.NEWS
    Trump Likened to Ancient Biblical Ruler Who Came to Aid of Israel, As Hostages Released, Peace Deal Signed
    Israelis are likening President Donald Trump to the ancient Persian King Cyrus, recorded in the Bible, following the release of the nations hostages from Hamas and the signing of a Gaza peace deal
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 3 Visualizações
  • YUBNUB.NEWS
    Trump to Host Zelenskyy Friday to Talk Air Defense, Long-Range Weapons
    U.S. President Donald Trump greets Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy ahead of a meeting with European leaders, at the White House on Aug. 18, 2025. Madalina Kilroy/The Epoch TimesUkrainian President
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 3 Visualizações
  • How To Add More Flavor To Your Texas Roadhouse Meal Without Paying Extra
    How To Add More Flavor To Your Texas Roadhouse Meal Without Paying Extra...
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 48 Visualizações
  • Snag a like-new 2021 Kindle Paperwhite for under $100 at Amazon
    Best e-reader deal: $97 like-new Kindle Paperwhite SAVE $38: As of Oct. 13, you can pick up a like-new Kindle Paperwhite with 16GB of storage for just $96.99 at Amazon. That's 28% cheaper than buying a brand-new model. While it has since been replaced with an upgraded model, the 2021 Kindle Paperwhite is still an excellent e-reader —...
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 23 Visualizações
  • WWW.THECOLLECTOR.COM
    The Holy Roman Emperor Who Nearly United the Old and New Worlds
    Charles, Duke of Burgundy, King of Spain, and Holy Roman Emperor: could this man become a universal monarch and claim the legacy of Charlemagne? Could he retain control of the Old World European realms while expanding his power in the New World of the Americas?An Expansive InheritanceCharles V, Holy Roman Emperor, Early to Mid-16th-century CE. Source: New York Public Library, New York CityThe man known to history as Charles V inherited his titles and realms from his ancestors. Born in Ghent in 1500, Charles father was Duke Philip IV (Philip the Fair) of Burgundy, the eldest son and heir of Holy Roman Emperor Maximilian I, who personally controlled the Habsburg lands in Austria and southwest Germany. When Maximilians wife Mary of Burgundy died in 1482, he laid claim to the wealthy Low Countries.Charles mother, Juana of Spain, was the daughter of King Ferdinand II of Aragon and Queen Isabella I of Castille, whose marriage led to the union of the two principal Spanish crowns. Accordingly, after Ferdinands death in 1516 Charles became king of Spain, taking over territories in Europe as well as the Americas.Spanish Kingdoms under Charles V, Freemans Historical Geography, 1903. Source: University of Texas, AustinAfter Charles became King of Spain, most of his ministers counselled against seeking the imperial title, left vacant by his grandfather Maximilians death in 1519. They were afraid that Charless election as emperor would stretch him too thin and bring more harm and good to his myriad kingdoms (Parker, p. 96).The seven prince electors of the Holy Roman Empire confirmed the 19-year-old as Holy Roman Emperor Charles V in 1519. He paid the imperial electors one million florins and annual pension guarantees to secure their votes. His payments prevented a challenge by the King of France, Francis I.Although the new emperor had less power in the empire than the English or French monarchs in their own realms, Charles could access unparalleled military and financial resources. The imperial title also brought great status and political influence as successor to both Charlemagne and the Roman emperors (Lieven, p. 181).Charles Vision of the Universal MonarchCharles V, Crowned Emperor, entering Rome with the Pope, from the Triumphs of Charles V, Cornelis Boel, 1614. Source: Metropolitan Museum of Art, New YorkCharles saw himself as the second sword of the Christian Commonwealth, serving alongside the Vicar of Christ, the Pope. Charles also envisioned leading the community of Christian princes on a crusade that would end the Ottoman threat and liberate the Holy Land. Meanwhile, in his domestic policy, he would defend the unity of the Christian community and the doctrines bequeathed by the Gospel and the great ecumenical councils that had steered the Catholic Church since the fourth century.On October 26, 1520, Charles, like his namesake and role model, Charlemagne, made a ceremonial entry into Aachen. After venerating the golden reliquary containing Charlemagnes skull, Charles entered the Cathedral and prostrated himself on the ground with his arms outstretched. Then, Charles, wearing the Imperial regalia, was anointed and invested with the imperial sword, scepter, orb, and Crown and seated upon Charlemagnes throne.This spectacle increased his power and entrenched Charles as the universal monarch in Charlemagnes image. The ceremony ended with a proclamation that the pope, having approved the election of Charles the Fifth, orders that henceforth he must take the title emperor (Parker, p. 116). At that time, however, he was only King of Germany, and while he swore his oath as Holy Roman Emperor, it was not until 1530 that Pope Clement VII formally crowned him emperor after Charles armies sacked Rome in 1527.European WarsBattle of Pavia Tapestries. Artist: Bernard van Orley, Weavers: Willem and Jan Dermoyen, 1531. Source: Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth, TexasCharles inherited a series of political rivalries in Europe as Holy Roman Emperor and King of Spain. He spent much of his reign at war with King Francis I of France, whom he captured at the Battle of Pavia in 1525, but fighting between France and the Holy Roman Empire continued for more than two decades. Charles established the first modern professional army in Europe, with the elite Spanish tercios at the core of his standing army.Another major foe was Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent, whose Ottoman Empire expanded into the Mediterranean and Hungary. Though imperial forces halted Ottoman expansion into Europe at the Siege of Vienna in 1529, there were few successes in the Mediterranean. After Charles V captured Tunis from the Ottomans in 1535, Suleiman allied with France to prevent Charles making further progress in North Africa.Charles claims to be the universal Christian monarch were not only challenged by the French, but by the Protestant Reformation. While Charles was prepared to introduce some moderate reforms, he defended the Catholic Church from attacks by Martin Luther. In 1531, a group of Protestant Princes formed the Schmalkaldic League to resist Charles on political and religious grounds. Although Charles won a victory at the Battle of Mhlberg in 1547, the war continued until the Peace of Augsburg in 1555, in which Charles allowed his vassals to choose their own religion.The New World: Religious and Economic PolicyHernn Corts, 19th century print. Source: New York Public Library, New York CityThe Conquistadors aggressive claims of land in the New World brought political power and cultural influence to Spain (Kamen, pg. 50). Each conquest expanded Charless empire. Hernan Corts invasion of the Aztecs in 1519 added Mexico or New Spain to the Empire. In 1522, Charles created a special committee of trusted ministers, chaired by Gattinara, to consider the rival claims of Corts and Diego Velzquez, Governor of Cuba, about control of the Mexican interior regions.A decade later, Francisco Pizarros 1532 conquest of the Incas included control of New Castile or Peru. Charles was willing to acknowledge Corts and the Pizarro brothers for their services in establishing the colonies, but he was ruthless in disciplining them. He marginalized them to acquire permanent access to the colonial resources to fund his dynastic goals in Europe (Parker, p. 527).While Charles V intended to spread Christianity in the New World, his advisors and the lesser nobility were focused on exploiting the natural resources of the colonies. Adventurers, settlers, and aspiring government officials were eager to share profits from the closely controlled gold and silver trade funneled through the port of Seville.During Charles reign, the amount of gold mined in the Americas increased from 40,000 ducats throughout the 1520s to approximately 900,000 over the course of the 1550s. Charles struggled to balance his duty to protect his new subjects while exploiting them and their lands to support his expensive wars and profit his growing empire.The New World: Treatment of Indigenous PeopleSpanish and Portuguese colonial empires in the 16th century. Map from F. W. Putzgers Historical School Atlas of Old, Middle and New History, 1903. Source: Boston Public Library, BostonPrevious rulers, such as Queen Isabella, had prohibited slavery in the colonies. Settlers controlled the native population under the encomienda system. The encomiendas holder took 80% of the profits from his territory. The remaining 20%, the royal fifth, belonged to the Emperor. The holder also used the indigenous people as farm laborers, miners, and craftsmen. In return, the holder agreed to provide Christian education, military protection, housing, and food.Charles asked the encomienda leaders to use force sparingly and cultivate positive relationships with local populations. Yet many settlers forced the locals to do back-breaking labor, withheld food from them, and punished them excessively, according to the Council of the Indies in 1526.While Charles limited the number of workers to 300 for each encomienda, most exceeded the limits by thousands. Entire families lived on the encomienda to work the lands without receiving any education, religious or otherwise.At the Potos Silver Mine in Bolivia, thousands of workers suffered and died from mercury poisoning during the 1540s, one of the most profitable periods for the Spanish coffers.Woodblock print of Potosi hill. Source: Library of CongressIn November 1527, the Emperor established an Audiencia in Mexico City, an appeals court with a president and five judges answering directly to the Council of the Indies. Unfortunately for Charles, the judges took a year to reach the New World; two died soon after they arrived, and choosing a president took even longer (Parker, p. 352).When Bartolome de las Casas, a Dominican priest, documented the cruelty in A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies, Charles proposed the New Laws of 1542 that prevented slavery and stopped encomienda owners from passing their lands to heirs after their deaths. The settlers struck back with protests and riots to force Charles to make concessions. The New Laws were partially revoked in 1546.AbdicationThe Victories of Emperor Charles V. Engraving by Dirk Volkertsz Coornhert, 1555. Source: British MuseumCharles V was the dominant European statesman of his time and controlled New World colonial expansion, driven by the amazing riches and promise of the Americas (Thomas, p. 27). The diverse nature of his empire increased his need to improvise. As Helmut G. Koenisberger observed in 1958 (the fourth centenary of the Emperors death), Charles was no Alexander or Napoleon who had conquered his empire, but the hereditary and legitimate ruler of each of his states whose laws and customs he had sworn to maintain (Parker, p. 517).Charles vision of a universal empire did not become a reality. The Protestant Reformation split the Catholic empire, and continuing conflict with France prevented a unified Europe. The New World colonies presented unique governing challenges and moral dilemmas. Charlesenergy and physical health declined as the stresses of managing his enormous empire increased.After ruling his vast empire for over three decades, the 56-year-old Charles V abdicated from his thrones in 1555-1556 and reluctantly split his realm between two branches of the Habsburg family. His son, Philip II, inherited the Spanish Empire, the Netherlands, and Italy, while his brother Ferdinand inherited the Habsburg hereditary lands in central Europe and became Holy Roman Emperor. Charles retired to the Monastery of Yuste and died in 1558.BibliographyBohnstedt, J.(1968): The Infidel Scourge of God: The Turkish Menace as Seen by German Pamphleteers of the Reformation Era, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 58, no. 9 (1968): 19.Kamen, H. (2004). Empire: How Spain Became a World Power, 1492-1763. Perennial.Lieven, D. (2022). In the Shadow of the Gods: The Emperor in World History. Viking.Parker, G. (2019). Emperor: A New Life of Charles V. Yale University Press.Thomas, H. (2011). The Golden Age: The Spanish Empire of Charles V. Penguin Books.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 6 Visualizações
  • WWW.THECOLLECTOR.COM
    7 Must-See D-Day Landing & Battle for Normandy Sites
    June 6, 2024 marked the 80th anniversary of D-Day. For decades, visitors from across the world have traveled to France to commemorate those who fought to liberate France and other areas of Europe from Nazi German occupation. Numerous official and private monuments and museums dedicated to the events are scattered across the Normandy region. This article explores seven must-see D-Day Landing sites connected to the Normandy campaign in WWII. Visiting these locations offers a moving sense of the planning, execution, and human cost of D-Day and the Battle of Normandy.A Brief Overview of D-Day and the Normandy Campaign, 1944Into the Jaws of Death US Troops wading through water and Nazi gunfire, photograph by Robert F. Sargent, c. June 6, 1944. Source: Wikimedia Commons/National Archives CatalogAt the Quebec Conference in 1943, Allied leaders agreed to invade Hitlers Fortress Europe via a Cross-Channel invasion of France from the UK. Codenamed Operation Overlord, over 150,000 troops from the USA, Britain, Canada, and a dozen other nations stormed the beaches of Normandy on June 6, 1944.Author Robert J. Mueller notes that the invasion force, led by British General Bernard Law Montgomery, targeted five beaches. From east to west, these beaches are best known by their codenames, Sword, Juno, Gold, Omaha, and Utah (2009, 323).The seaborne invasion occurred in conjunction with a preliminary airborne assault. Indeed, Mueller points out that the first Allied troops to step foot on French soil since the failed Dieppe raid of 1942 were members of the 6th British Airborne Division (2009, 325).We consider D-Day (or Jour J in French) to be one of the Second World Wars decisive chapters. However, the D-Day Landings of June 6, 1944, were only the beginning of a 76-day intense battle with defending German forces for control of Normandy.Following heavy fighting during the so-called Normandy Breakout, Allied forces liberated the region from German occupation. Historian Stephen Badsey explains that the Allies triumphantly entered Paris on August 25, 1944 (1990, 91).Historians Douglas Brinkley and Ronald Drez point out that the term D-Day originated in the American war effort in France during WWI. Moreover, they say the term was associated with nearly every planned Allied military offensive during WWII before 1944 (2004, 6). However, only one eventthe invasion of Normandy on June 6, 1944would be remembered as D-Day.1. D-Day Landing Sites: Caen Memorial MuseumPhotograph of an Exhibit in the Mmorial de Caen, by Iain Cameron, 2014. Source: Wikimedia CommonsThe Caen Memorial (Le Mmorial Un Muse pour la Paix) is an excellent museum to explore as a starting point for any tour of D-Day and Normandy campaign-related sites.It features a detailed overview of D-Day and the Battle of Normandy. While focused on the fighting in Normandy in 1944, the museum documents the history of 20th-century conflicts from WWI to the Cold War.Historian Stephen Badsey points out that British and Canadian forces secured control of Caen through heavy fighting between July 8 and 20, 1944 (1990, 56).Caen also boasts a rich history beyond the Normandy campaign. William the Conqueror is often associated with Caen. For example, Robert Mueller notes that William the Conqueror built Caens citadel and fortifications in the eleventh century. These were heavily damaged by the fighting in 1944 (2009, 333).2. Arromanches-les-BainsPhotograph of the remains of the Mulberry Harbor at Arromanches-les-Bains, photograph by Myrabella. Source: Wikimedia CommonsLogistic concerns are often overlooked in popular conceptions of D-Day. However, logistics were at the forefront of Allied planners thoughts in the months and days leading up to the invasion. The Allies turned to artificial marinas, codenamed Mulberry Harbors, to keep the massive invasion force supplied.As historian Stephen Badsey points out, these artificial harbors ensured that Allied reinforcements exceeded casualties, and there were never severe shortages of fuel, ammunition, or supplies. On the other hand, the German defenders faced massive logistical problems and suffered heavy losses in attempting to hold on to territory surrounding the beachheads (1990, 45).Youll find remnants of a Mulberry Harbor known as Port Winston just off the coast of Arromanches-les-Bains. Robert Mueller notes that the massive Mulberry Harbor at Omaha Beach was destroyed in a major storm a few weeks after the D-Day landings (2009, 342).Arromanches is also home to a museum dedicated to the D-Day invasion and an impressive 360-degree Circular Cinema. From the heights near the cinema, Mueller points out that the British Royal Hampshire Regiment, which had landed at nearby Gold Beach, attacked and captured Arromanches (2009, 342).3. Omaha BeachOmaha Beach, Normandy, photograph by Joe DeSousa, 2017. Source: Wikimedia CommonsKnown as Bloody Omaha, American troops storming ashore here faced the heaviest fighting on D-Day. According to historians Douglas Brinkley and Ronald Drez, German defenses successfully resisted the early waves of attacking Americans and inflicted heavy casualties (2004, 132).Despite the difficulty the Americans encountered on Omaha Beach, Stephen Badsey says that the Allies most significant setback on June 6 occurred during the British assault on Sword Beach (1990, 35).On most summer days today, most of Omaha Beach is back to being a playground for beachgoers. Indeed, the Normandy coastline has been a popular summer beach destination for tourists for over a century.However, remnants of the fighting in June 1944 are present on the beach and nearby in the form of monuments, concrete bunker ruins, and the American cemetery.4. Pointe du Hoc Ranger MemorialAerial View of Pointe du Hoc, 2015, U.S. Army photo by Sgt. Austin Berner. Source: Wikimedia Commons/United States ArmyGerman artillery positions on the formidable Pointe du Hoc caused deep concerns among Allied planners during invasion preparations.French officials later dedicated a memorial to the US Second Ranger Battalion commanded by Lt. Col. James E. Rudder. Historians Douglas Brinkley and Ronald Drez note that these American rangers were tasked with destroying the heavy German artillery that was placed to shell Utah and Omaha beaches (2004, 118-119).Rudders rangers did not realize as they scaled these incredibly steep cliffs that the artillery pieces had already been relocated. Nevertheless, the rangers successfully resisted German counterattacks for two days without reinforcement. According to Robert Mueller, ranger casualties totaled over 60 percent (2009, 350).Large craters and the concrete ruins of German defenses demonstrate that this battle-scarred area remains much the same as it appeared in the aftermath of the fighting in June 1944.5. Juno Beach CentrePhotograph of Juno Beach Centre, Courselles-sur-Mer, Normandy, by Zairon, 2019. Source: Wikimedia CommonsThe Canadian 3rd Division attacked German defenders in the Juno Beach sector of the D-Day invasion. As Robert Mueller points out, the Canadian invaders made the most progress of any invading force during the June 6 landings (2009, 327-328).The Juno Beach Centre is the only museum in the region dedicated to Canadas role in the D-Day invasion and Normandy campaign. According to Mueller, the beach in front of the building was known to the attackers as Mike Red and assigned to the Royal Winnipeg Rifles (2009, 340). There is also a memorial nearby to the Royal Winnipeg Rifles.There are remnants of German defensive bunkers between the museum and the beachfront.6. Utah Beach Landing MuseumPhotograph of a WWII Landing Boat outside the Museum, photograph by Hansm, 2009. Source: Wikimedia CommonsRobert Mueller explains that Utah Beach was known as La Madeleine before D-Day (2009, 352). Today, it is home to several monuments dedicated to American units and a museum dedicated to the Allied landing at Utah Beach.American forces landing at Utah Beach encountered less resistance than their counterparts at Omaha Beach. According to Mueller, unlike some other sectors, Allied naval and air bombardment effectively cut German lines of communication in the vicinity of Utah Beach (2009, 330).Nevertheless, there were difficulties at Utah Beach. Douglas Brinkley and Ronald Drez note that the invasion had come ashore nearly 2,000 yards south of its scheduled landing site. However, Brigadier General Theodore Roosevelt Jr. steadily directed the landing force and ensured that it overcame the initial logistical challenges. For his role in the invasion, Roosevelt Jr. would be awarded the Medal of Honor (2004, 111).7. Normandy American Cemetery and MemorialPhotograph of the Normandy American Cemetery, September 27, 2013. Source: Wikimedia Commons/US Department of Defense, VirginiaBrigadier General Theodore Roosevelt Jr. did not live to see the Normandy campaigns successful conclusion. Douglas Brinkley and Ronald Drez note that Roosevelt died of a heart attack on July 12, 1944 (2004, 115). His grave is at the Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial near Omaha Beach.The Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial is the regions most significant and moving site related to the 1944 campaign. As Robert Mueller points out, more than one million people visit the site annually (2009, 343).The site is located on a bluff overlooking the once bitterly contested sand of Omaha Beach. Despite the seemingly endless rows of uniform white marble crosses and Stars of David, the graves represent just roughly 40% of American losses in the Normandy campaign. Thus, the cemetery is a moving reminder of the sacrifices of Allied combatants involved in the D-Day invasion, the Battle of Normandy, and the liberation of France.The Battlefield Bonuses: Beyond the D-Day Landing SitesBayeux TapestryScene 44Duke William and his two half-brothers: to his right, Bishop Odo of Bayeux, and to his left, Count Robert of Mortain. Source: Wikimedia CommonsHistorian Donald Featherstone called must-see cultural and historical sites near battlefields Battlefield Bonuses (1998, 25). Normandy has no shortage of significant cultural and historical monuments beyond the D-Day invasion sites. In other words, these are more than detours on any trip to the WWII battlefields in the area.Bayeux is a must-see stop for any history enthusiast visiting Normandy. Indeed, it is home to an impressive museum dedicated to the Normandy invasion in 1944 and the largest Commonwealth war cemetery in the region.Although its WWII significance alone makes Bayeux worth visiting, the Bayeux Tapestry is the real star attraction. The famous embroidery depicts scenes from the Norman Conquest of England in 1066 from a decidedly Norman perspective.If time permits, any Normandy itinerary can include a visit to Mont Saint-Michel. The abbey on the photogenic tidal island is one of the most visited tourist attractions in the world, and with good reason.References and Further ReadingBadsey, S. (1990). Normandy 1944: Allied Landings and Breakout. Osprey.Brinkley, D. & Drez, R.J. (2004). Voices of Valor: D-Day: June 6, 1944. Bulfinch Press.Featherstone, D. (1998). The Battlefield Walkers Handbook. Crowood.Mueller, R.J. (2009). Fields of War: Fifty Key Battlefields in France and Belgium. French Battlefields.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 6 Visualizações
  • WWW.THECOLLECTOR.COM
    Catherine of Aragon, the Queen Who Challenged a King
    It is easy to overlook or forget, amid the notorious divorced, beheaded, died, divorced, beheaded, survived rhyme and the glamorization of the Six Wives, that Catherine of Aragon was married to Henry VIII for longer than all his other wives put together. Lasting nearly 25 years, Henry and Catherines marriage was harmonious much of the time, with the king doting and relying upon his consort, who could easily have made a formidable ruler in her own right. What made Catherine a match for Henryand where did it go wrong?Catherine of Aragon Before HenryWedding portrait of Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile, unknown artist, 15th century. Source: World History EncyclopediaBorn in 1485, Catherines patronymic (of Aragon) belies the importance of her parentage as a child of King Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile. Ferdinand and Isabella, before the marriage, were heirs presumptive to the separate kingdoms of Aragon and Castile. Their union provided a de facto unification of the two kingdoms, which together accounted for the majority of the land on the Iberian peninsula and what would, some two centuries later, be called Spain.Jointly, the couple oversaw a consolidation of Spanish territories, the promotion of Catholicism as the sole religion (including the expulsion of Muslims and Jews), and the beginnings of Spains colonial exploits across the Atlantic.With this family background, Catherine unsurprisingly received the best education available. She was an eligible marriage prospect for members of other European dynasties looking to strengthen their alliance with the new, formidable power of a united Aragon and Castile. She was a particularly attractive option for Henry Tudor, or Henry VII of England, when in the late 1490s, he sought a match for his heir, Prince Arthur. Indeed, Catherine descended, on her mothers side, from the House of Lancaster, which had ruled England intermittently for the last two centuries.Portrait of Arthur, Prince of Wales, unknown artist, c. 1500. Source: Wikimedia Commons/Royal Collection Trust, UKHenry VIIs accession to the throne, following the Battle of Bosworth, had ended the Wars of the Roses, in which the House of York had challenged the House of Lancaster, both claiming legitimacy via their common ancestor, John of Gaunt (son of Edward III and father of Henry IV).Catherine of Aragon was also descended from John of Gaunt. Thus, a marriage between her and Arthur would provide the same kind of dynastic strengthening that Henry VII himself had achieved by marrying Elizabeth of York, making it harder for dissenters to challenge the Tudors claim to the throne.Catherine and Arthur were married by proxy (meaning that the ceremony was performed in their absence, with stand-ins of marriageable age) in 1499 when both were 13 years old. They were married in person two years later when Catherine moved to England, where she would spend the rest of her life. Within less than a year, however, Arthur died of some form of plague or fever, and Catherine became a widow aged just 16.Hers was not an ordinary widowhood but instead a time of political limbo. Catherine had brought a sizable dowry on her marriage to Arthur, only half of which Ferdinand had paid. Allowing her to return to Spain would have meant rescinding the claim to the other half and paying back the first half.Always financially conscious, Henry VII was reluctant to let this happen, but by 1504, the advantages brought by Catherines parental connections to Aragon and Castile were reduced. Isabella of Castile died, and Catherine now provided merely a connection to the smaller, less prosperous kingdom of Aragon. Castile passed to Catherines older sister Juana, who was married to Philip, Duke of Burgundymeaning a new set of alliance negotiations for Henry.Portrait thought to depict Catherine of Aragon, by Michael Sittow, c. 1502. Source: Tudor ExtraKeeping Catherine in somewhat restricted conditions in London, Henry VII allegedly pondered marrying her himself (his wife Elizabeth had died in 1503) but instead chose to betroth her to his younger son, the future Henry VIII. In this period, Catherine also acted as Spanish ambassador to England, corresponding with her father, Ferdinand, and meeting with Henry VII: her first taste of diplomacy and the first time a woman had acted as ambassador in Europe.Catherine now faced a further trial: special dispensation from the Vatican would be required to allow the young Henry to marry his brothers widow. Requiring papal dispensation was fairly common in royal families at this time. Catherines own parents had required dispensation to marry because, as second cousins, they were within the prohibited degrees of consanguinity. But Catherines case required her to make a testimony that would later become highly contentious. As she swore, her marriage to Arthur was never consummated and, therefore, could be considered not to have taken place.Queen Catherine: Partnership, Patronage, and PoliticsCatherine of Aragon, Petworth House portrait, photo by Ann Longmore-Etheridge. Source: FlickrCatherine and Henry VIII were finally married shortly after he came to the throne in 1509 on the death of his father. They were crowned in a lavish ceremony that celebrated the heritage of both monarchs, proudly displaying their emblems: for Henry, the Tudor rose, which combined Lancaster white and York red; for Catherine, the pomegranate, a reminder of her Spanish roots and a symbol of fertility.At the start of Henry VIIIs reign, ambassadors and chroniclers noted his possession of all the qualities befitting a Renaissance man: he was accomplished in several languages, a devoted scholar, especially of theology, and enjoyed poetry and music. He was also an avid jouster and rode in Catherines colors, with H&C on his armor and a pomegranate on his shield.Although confined to the role of spectator at jousts, Catherine shared in Henrys other pursuits as an intellectual equal. She, too, had had a thorough humanist education and was devoted to promoting education in her new role as queen consort. Scholars such as Erasmus and Thomas More found in her a willing patron, and in 1523, she commissioned Juan Luis Vives to write the treatise Education of a Christian Woman. Dedicated to Catherine, the text argued that women ought to be educated the same way as men because they were just as capable and the state as a whole would benefit from a fully educated populace.Detail showing Henry VIII jousting in front of Catherine of Aragon, from the Westminster Tournament Roll, 1511. Source: Wikimedia Commons/College of Arms, LondonThese were radical ideas, especially since Vives advocated educating women regardless of their position in society. They presaged the emphasis placed on womens education by Henry VIIIs sixth wife, Catherine Parr. Unlike Parr, though, Catherine of Aragon held these ideals within a Catholic framework. Parr might, for instance, have objected to Vivess presentation of his egalitarian ideas entirely in Latin, which vast swathes of the population could not understand.Education of a Christian Woman was principally written for Catherine and Henrys daughter Mary, born in 1516. Mary was not their first child, but the first and only one to survive beyond just a few weeks. Beginning in 1510, Catherine had at least six pregnancies. Most were stillborn or miscarried. A son, born in 1511, was named Henry and celebrated as the longed-for heir, but he died suddenly a few weeks later.There are many possible explanations for the fertility problems which became such an obsession for Henry. It is doubtful that the issues were solely on Catherines side because we know that Henry and his next wife, Anne Boleyn, had a similar series of miscarriages and stillbirths, also resulting in just one living daughter. Then again, Henry did have sons, not only with his third wife, Jane Seymour, but also with his mistress, Elizabeth Blount, in 1519. Henry Fitzroy (the surname means son of the king) was openly recognized by Henry and accepted at court, though he could not be officially made the heir. He died in 1536.King Henry VIII, by Joos Van Cleve, c. 1530-35. Source: Wikimedia Commons/Royal Collection Trust, UKCatherines response to Henrys infidelities is, perhaps unsurprisingly, not recorded. Only when things became more extremewhen he began to talk of putting her aside in favor of Anne Boleynwas she obliged to react.Before this, though, there were few signs of any obstacles in Catherine and Henrys relationship, even despite their difficulty in producing an heir. Henry continued to value her highly, leaning on her more than many prior monarchs had leaned on their consorts. Perhaps inspired by the marriage of equals of her parents, Catherine actively supported Henry in a political capacity.Most famously, she organized troops to send to Scotland in 1513 while Henry was away fighting another military campaign in France. Having gathered an army, she rode under the royal banner to address them with a rousing speech. The English troops went on to defeat the Scots at the Battle of Flodden, at which the Scottish king himself, James IV, was killed.Reporting the news to Henry in France, Catherine enclosed a piece of Jamess bloodied coat to use as a banner. It was perhaps this aptitude for the art of war that made Thomas Cromwell, later Henrys most prominent minister, reportedly say of Catherine: if not for her sex, she could have defied all the heroes of History.Queen Catherines Portraits DecodedPortrait by Juan de Flandes thought to be Catherine of Aragon, c. 1496. Source: Tudor Extra/Museo Nacional Thyssen-Bornemisza, MadridLike many people in positions of power throughout the ages, Catherine used portraiture to advance a chosen image of herself. Catherines portraits are particularly interesting for the insights they give into how she viewed her marriage with Henry, as it evolved over two decades and eventually soured.Portrait of Catherine of Aragon, by an unknown artist, 1520. Source: National Portrait Gallery, LondonNaturally, Catherine is always pictured in clothes and jewelry indicative of her status as one of the richest women in Europe. But there were occasional touches of symbolism, too: a portrait thought to be an eleven-year-old Catherine shows her holding a Lancaster rose, indicating the dynastic path she was soon to follow.A portrait from 1520 shows the queen in a rich red gown with gold sleeves patterned with pomegranates. This symbol, which also appeared on royal buildings (and can still be seen on a doorway at Hampton Court), connotes Catherines devotion to her marriage and her hopes for fertility, in spite of the numerous problems she and Henry had had by this time.Catherine of Aragon Portrait, by Lucas Horenbout, 1525. Source: Wikimedia CommonsAnother symbol Catherine used, and a more surprising one, was a monkey. Traditionally, monkeys in art could stand for mischief, evil spirits, and even the Devil. In a miniature from 1525, around the time Henry was beginning proceedings to annul his marriage to Catherine, she is pictured holding a monkey, which holds a rose in one hand and grasps, with the other, a crucifix hanging from Catherines dress.The monkey itself is probably present simply because it was a fairly common pet for people of high status and possibly a reminder of Catherines native Spain. However, its positioning is the most important part of the portrait. Clutching a rose signifies unswerving loyalty to the Tudor dynasty, and pointing at the crucifix underlines devotion to faith. As what would become known as The Kings Great Matter unfurled, Catherine was determined to uphold these two qualities: steadfast loyalty to Henry and her role as his wife and a pious devotion to Gods will.The Kings Great MatterHenry VIII and Catherine of Aragon before Papal Legates at Blackfriars, 1529, by Frank Salisbury, 1910. Source: Heritage Collections UK Parliament, London/ Design and Artists Copyright SocietyHaving joined the royal court as one of Catherines ladies-in-waiting in 1522, Anne Boleyn was by 1525 the object of a protracted and persistent pursuit by Henryprotracted mostly because Anne would not settle for being his mistress, but sought to become his wife. She may well have encouraged Henrys belief that his marriage to Catherine was unlawful in the eyes of God and that this was why it had not led to a male heir.In religious terms, Henrys case for annulling his marriage to Catherine was based on the fact that she had been married to his brother Arthur first. Consulting the Old Testament, he found in Leviticus, chapter 20, verse 21: If a man takes his brothers wife, it is impurity. He has uncovered his brothers nakedness; they shall be childless.Those who opposed the annulment, which included not just Catholic supporters such as Thomas More and Bishop John Fisher but also the Protestant monk Martin Luther, could have pointed to a contradictory passage from chapter 25 of Deuteronomy, verse 5, which actually obliges a man to marry his brothers widow if their marriage has been childless.In political terms, various factors complicated The Kings Great Matter. In 1527, Henrys minister, Cardinal Thomas Wolsey, convened an ecclesiastical court. The hearing would give Henry the opportunity to explain his conviction that he had married Catherine unlawfully, Catherine the opportunity to maintain that she and Arthur had not consummated their marriage, and theological and legal experts, including a papal legate, the opportunity to offer their opinions.The Trial of Queen Catherine of Aragon, by Henry Nelson ONeil, 1846-1848. Source: Wikimedia CommonsBut events outside England overshadowed these proceedings. Also, in 1527, Rome was sacked by forces belonging to the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles V, who happened to be Catherine of Aragons nephew. Charles had acceded to the title in 1519, gaining the vast territories of the Holy Roman Empire, which included swathes of Germany, the Low Countries, Austria, and Italy. He also, as the son of Catherines sister Juana, ruled most of Spain.The Sack of Rome in 1527 forced the pope, Clement VII, into captivity in the citys Castel SantAngelo. Practically, it was now difficult for envoys from England to gain access to the pope to consult on Henrys case. In terms of international relations, it was highly unlikely that the pope was going to allow Henry to annul his marriage to the aunt of the immensely powerful ruler who currently held him prisoner.Portrait of Thomas More by Hans Holbein the Younger, 1527. Source: Wikimedia Commons/The Frick Collection, New YorkBy the early 1530s, Henry could endure the stalemate no longer and began to believe that, as a divinely ordained monarch, he should not be impeded by papal authority. He took steps towards proclaiming himself the head of the Church of England and obtaining a divorce from Catherine, banishing her from court in 1531.In late 1532 or early 1533, Henry privately married Anne Boleyn. Supporters of Catherine, such as More and Fisher, grew even more dissenting when Henrys Act of Succession in 1534 required them to repudiate Henrys marriage to Catherine, invalidate Marys claim to the throne, recognize Henrys marriage to Anne, and confirm that the pope had no authority in England. When More and Fisher refused to sign, they were imprisoned and executed for treason.All this time, Catherine, despite her powerful supporters, had no political sway of her own. There was little she could do other than write to these supporters, including her nephew Charles V, describing Henrys poor treatment of her and affirming her continued belief that she was his wife, legally and morally. It was reported that Catherine, throughout Henrys flirtation with Anne and the gradual institution of Anne as the new queen, continued to make and embroider Henrys shirts.Catherine of Aragon After Henry VIIIReconstruction of Kimbolton Castle in the Tudor period, by Stephen Conlin based on research by Simon Thurley, 2006. Source: The Tudor Travel Guide/ Stephen Conlin 2006Catherine had been a key figure in the series of events precipitating the English Reformation. But after she was banished from court and Henry married Anne, Catherine resolutely continued to follow her Catholic faith and was now completely sidelined. Whereas Anne of Cleves, Henrys other divorced wife, would, the following decade, live in prosperity after the marriage ended, gaining the honor of being treated as the kings sister, Catherine of Aragon was only granted the right to the title Dowager Princess of Wales (as the widow of Arthur, former Prince of Wales).The remainder of Catherines life was peripatetic: she was transferred around a series of royal castles, mostly in the Home Counties around London. She had rejected the idea of entering a convent (as some consorts, such as Elizabeth Woodville, did following the death of the king) because she maintained that she still had a husband living and had sworn before God to uphold her duty to him. Her life at these castles, though, was not dissimilar to convent life. By the time she was living at Kimbolton Castle (Cambridgeshire) in 1534, she lived a life of prayer and fasting, confining herself to one room except to attend Mass.She was not permitted to see her daughter, Mary, communicating with her by secret letters. She also communicated with her nephew, Emperor Charles V, asking him to protect Mary after she died. This was, it turned out, not long coming. In January 1536, she died at Kimbolton aged 50, possibly from cancer. In a curious and dark turn of events, Anne Boleyn miscarried on the day of Catherines funeral: a child who would have been the long-desired male heir. Neither she, Henry, nor Mary attended the funeral at Peterborough Cathedral.The tomb of Catherine of Aragon at Peterborough Cathedral in Cambridgeshire, England, photo by Photo by David Iliff (License: CC BY-SA 3.0), 2014. Source: Wikimedia CommonsAt the time, Catherines supporters celebrated her as a paragon of wifely devotion and piety, lamenting she had been one of the first victims of Henrys ruthlessness as he pursued a break with Rome at all costs. Quite understandably, this aspect of Catherines legacy has overshadowed all that she achieved and stood for as queen before, around 1525, when there was no sign that Henry would take a second wife, let alone six in total.Her role in shaping England immediately prior to the Reformation was significant, matching the young Henry VIIIs humanist and Renaissance values, as well as his aims on the battlefield and in diplomacy. Her refusal to give in to Henrys will and cooperate with the annulment proceedings had an even more significant impact on English history, albeit one unintended by her: leading to the Reformation and a legacy of religious uncertainty throughout the Tudor period and beyond.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 6 Visualizações
  • WWW.THECOLLECTOR.COM
    How the League of Nations Successes Inspired the United Nations
    From 1920 to 1946, the League of Nations was the main international organization designed to resolve international disputes. It proved to be inadequate for the coming of WWII. However, it also had successes that set a precedent for the UN. This article talks about several of these successes and what they proved in terms of multilateral diplomacy.What Was the League of Nations?League of Nations emblem, 1939. Source: National WWII MuseumThe League of Nations was an organization intended to resolve international disputes and ensure peace around the world. Modeled on Westphalian principles of state sovereignty, it was an institution established by the Treaty of Versailles. It had multiple aims: to help refugees return after the end of WWI, stabilize the world economy and labor market, and resolve territorial disputes. It was the strongest multilateral organization to be created in history and it had enormous responsibilities.Based in Geneva, the League was composed of three different bodies. First was the Assembly, where all members were represented. It met at least once a year and every member had a vote. Initially, the Assembly had representatives from 41 countries; membership would later grow to 63. Then there was the Council, which functioned like the UN Security Council. The Council had similar roles to the Assembly but also had special administrative tasks. It was composed of four permanent members and several temporary elected members. Lastly, the administrative body was the Secretariat. It headed the organization and supervised protocols in the meetings of the Assembly and Council.Despite US President Woodrow Wilsons instrumental role in creating the League during negotiations at Versailles, the Leagues authority was undermined by the United States refusal to join the organization. Much of the world was under colonial rule and did not have an independent voice at League meetings. However, it also had accomplishments in the interwar period. It created the International Labor Organization and assisted with refugee resettlement. It also resolved several international disputes.Yugoslavia vs Albania DisputeAhmed Zogu, Albanian military commander (1921-22), prime minister (1922-1925), (president 1925-28), King Zog I (1928-1939). Source: Wikimedia CommonsWhen Albania gained independence from the Ottoman Empire in 1913, it sought to distinguish itself from its neighbors and offer a haven for Balkan Muslims. It faced serious challenges in the aftermath of WWI. The governing institutions of the country were weak, the economy was a mess, and neighbors on all sides had designs on its territory. It joined the League of Nations in 1920 and hoped to gain international acceptance.Both Greece and the newly-formed Kingdom of Yugoslavia were alarmed by the creation of a Muslim-majority state in the Balkans. Both states sought to control Albanian territory and claimed that the country was oppressing Christians within its borders. Yugoslavia was especially paranoid about Albanian actions and, in 1921, proceeded to send soldiers into a disputed area on the border. They hoped to have support from the rest of the Christian world.However, the League reacted quickly and in Albanias favor. Representatives from Britain, France, Italy, and Japan arrived in Albania to take stock of the situation. The United States, while not a member of the League, was a major backer of the Albanian government, which had just moved its capital to Tirana. Upon receiving the commissions report, the League held a vote that ruled in favor of Albania. Yugoslavia protested vociferously but had little support for its position and agreed to withdraw its troops. This action by the League averted a major war between the two states and demonstrated that smaller countries like Albania could effectively obtain diplomatic support from the League.land Islands DisputeMap of the land Islands, 2022. Source: Quick Worlds Map of the DayFurther north, Sweden and Finland had their own dispute over the land Islands in the Baltic Sea. Strategically located in the northern Baltic, the archipelago had been under Swedish rule until 1809, when it was occupied and subsequently annexed by the Russian Empire during the Russo-Swedish War of 1809-1810. The islands were supposed to be demilitarized, but Russia built fortifications on them during the First World War. Most of its population were Swedish-speaking and Stockholm had long desired to reassert sovereignty over the islands.Finland gained independence when the Russian Empire collapsed in 1917 but collapsed into civil war. The chaos and bloodshed from this war caused island residents to panic and demand Sweden take control. Once the war ended, Finland passed the Autonomy Act for the islands and promised full citizenship and rights for the residents. The Swedish government and local authorities rejected this approach and insisted that the islands belonged to them. Both countries went to the League to ask for guidance and plead their cases.Initially, the League asked the International Committee of Jurists to rule if the League was able to take up this case. Once it received consent, the League proceeded to rule on the issue. The Council created a Commission of Rapporteurs to recommend a ruling. After they investigated, the Council passed a resolution stating that the islands were Finnish, but they must remain demilitarized, Swedish culture must be protected, and the islands must retain autonomy. Even though Stockholm was disappointed, they acknowledged the ruling and Finland asserted sovereignty over the islands.Upper Silesia PlebiscitePolling Station in Katowice during the Upper Silesian plebiscite. Source: Polish Institute of National RemembranceThe region of Silesia had been traditionally Polish but became part of Prussia following the Third Partition of Poland in 1795. Following the unification of Germany in 1871, Silesia became part of the new German Empire. The German authorities in Berlin sought to integrate the region into the area by settling the territory with ethnic Germans. This enraged the Polish majority, who feared that they would be overwhelmed by the newcomers. When Poland gained independence at the end of WWI, they sought to take control of the region from a weakened Germany.The Silesian uprisings by ethnic Poles against Weimar Germany became very serious as a result of backing from the government in Warsaw. A large Polish community lived in Upper Silesia east of the Oder River, while Germans were in the majority to the west. As the uprising continued, the League of Nations sought to resolve the conflict by diplomatic means.On March 20, 1921, the Upper Silesia region held a plebiscite to determine the fate of the region. Despite the presence of Entente soldiers to ensure order, the vote suffered from periodic bouts of violence. When the final vote was tallied, the result was inconclusive. Therefore, the League decided to partition the territory between Germany and Poland. Anyone who wanted to move to live with their ethnic kin was free to do so. Both Germany and Poland accepted the new border and it remained as such until 1939.Creation and Administration of DanzigSt Marys Church in the Free City of Danzig, 1920. Source: In Your PocketOne of the flashpoints during the interwar period was the city of Danzig/Gdansk. Under the Treaty of Versailles, the port city was designated the Free City of Danzig and administered by the League of Nations. This was to ensure that Poland had access to the sea while acknowledging the ethnic German majority in the city.The League allowed Poland to control the Free Citys foreign relations. Poland also oversaw the waters off the city and the port facilities. However, the actual administration of the Free City fell under the Leagues Council to ensure that the city remained neutral. The citys budget fell under a local council elected in League-supervised votes. This arrangement worked for many years because the locals wanted peace. Additionally, neither Germany nor Poland initially wanted to fight over control of the city.While the Free City remained calm for much of the interwar period, the rise of the Nazis changed how Germany viewed the city. Local elections saw the Nazi party gain with ethnic German voters. After 1933, the Germans decided to seize control of the local municipality and annexed the city in 1939. While the administration ended in failure, the Leagues oversight of the city was seen as a success. The Council ensured that social services were provided and that the locals could vote fairly. The main challenge came from League members failing to uphold the mandate over the city.Ending the Greco-Bulgarian Border IncidentBelasitsa Nature Park near Demir Kapija, where the initial incident involving the stray dog took place. Source: Wikimedia CommonsSimilar to the crisis between Albania and Yugoslavia, the League found itself trying to stop a war between Greece and Bulgaria in the Balkans. For much of the 19th and 20th centuries, Bulgaria and Greece sought control over disputed territories such as the area around the town of Petrich. Greece believed that the territory belonged to them because of the presence of ethnic Greeks. However, Bulgaria had sovereignty over the territory.On October 22, 1925, a Greek soldier on the border chased after his dog when it ran into Bulgarian territory. Bulgarian guards panicked and fired, killing the Greek soldier in the process. Bulgaria hoped to defuse the situation and apologized for the incident. In retaliation, Greek troops reportedly crossed the border into Bulgaria and took control of Petrich, while both sides sent reinforcements to the disputed area.Amid concerns that a general war could break out between Greece and Bulgaria, the League reacted quickly to bring an end to the dispute, sometimes known as the War of the Stray Dog. Although Greece stated that its incursion was not meant to be a land grab, the League immediately ordered Greek troops to withdraw. It also ordered Greece to pay an indemnity for attacking Bulgarian soil. While the deal was considered excessively harsh towards Greece, it prevented another Balkan conflict from breaking out and reiterated the importance of territorial integrity. League members were concerned about Greek expansionism and hoped that they could urge Athens to stop demanding control over neighboring territories.Laying the Foundations for the United NationsThe Palace of Nations in Geneva, Headquarters of the League of Nations. Source: League of Nations ArchiveThe Leagues ignominious end meant that the organization was considered a systemic failure of international diplomacy. The failures to stop Germany, Japan, and Italy from building their empires and starting WWII demonstrated the internal weaknesses of the League. Additionally, the lack of representation of colonized nations meant that the League was dominated by Europeans. Its failure to resolve disputes over territories like Corfu and the Ruhr reflected the institutional malaise.However, the organizations successes offered a blueprint for the United Nations. Its ability to mediate in certain disputes in the Baltics and Balkans demonstrated effective forms of multilateral diplomacy. The assistance it provided to refugees foreshadowed the work of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. The Leagues creation of the International Labor Organization marked the first time international labor standards were set up by an international organization. Lastly, the Leagues structure proved to be very similar to the United Nations with the Assembly, Council, and Secretariat. For all its ignominy, the League of Nations still lives today in the United Nations, just with larger membership and a stronger mandate.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 6 Visualizações
  • WWW.THECOLLECTOR.COM
    Inside Anyang and the Rise of the Shang Dynasty
    The Shang dynasty is thought to have emerged around 1600 BCE and declined about 1046 BCE. The dynasty rose following the decline of the preceding Xia dynasty. According to historical records, the last Xia king, Jie, was a tyrant. His harsh rule is said to have sparked rebellion in the region which eventually led to the downfall of the dynasty. The revolt was led by a noble leader called Cheng Tang. Cheng Tang was the leader of the Shang tribe. Under the guidance of his trusted advisors Yi Yin and Zhong Hui, he reportedly took advantage of the growing discontent in the region to build a coalition of allied states that formed the next dynasty. They spearheaded the military campaign that eventually toppled the Xia state in the Battle of Mingtiao.Outstanding Cultural ElementsYellow River MapArchaeological discoveries in the area have revealed a broad network of connected sites with a shared culture that united the Bronze Age communities across much of the Yellow River valley around the 16th century BCE. The early Shang period is recognized for its advanced society and for its expertise in bronze casting innovations which required large amounts of resources to mine and smelt. Experts often describe the Shang as the height of Chinas Bronze Age due to overwhelming evidence of metallurgy-related advancements.Works produced during this period include the massive Houmuwu Ding a ritual food vessel weighing about 1,836 pounds and the heaviest bronze object from the ancient world. Today, it stands as a symbol of remarkable achievements in early metalworking. Examples of bronze items found in Shang dynasty archaeological sites include ritual vessels and sophisticated weapons.Oracle bone inscriptions from the village of Hsiao-tun, Shang dynasty, 14th or 12th century BC. Source: BritannicaAdvanced architecture was another of the Shang dynastys major accomplishments. The Shang employed thousands of laborers to construct massive cities while following carefully planned layouts. In their capitals they built palaces, temples, ritual areas, government halls, and royal tombs.The earliest known form of Chinese writing carved on oracle bones called the Oracle bone script is also believed to have emerged during this time.The Kings PowersBronze water vessel with coiling dragon and taotie pattern, late Shang (c.13001050 BCThe Shang king was regarded as the chief fortune-teller and mediator with the spirit world and was believed to have the unique ability to communicate directly with the ancestors. Natural calamities such as droughts and floods were interpreted as signs of angry spirits, and a poor harvest or a lost battle would lead the king to hold a ceremony. The king would announce a human sacrifice ceremony for the next season using oracle bones so as to appease the gods. Soon after the declaration, many captured people would be killed as a sacrifice to the gods.How the Shang Dynasty Was DiscoveredShang Dynasty Oracle Bone. Source: Cambridge University LibraryFor centuries, the Shang Dynasty was talked about only in legends without any evidence of its existence. This aspect changed in 1899, when a Chinese scholar encountered some unusual ancient carvings. He soon realized that they were an early form of Chinese writing. In 1928, archaeologists began excavations at Yinxu, the last great city of the dynasty, and discovered the first physical evidence of the existence of the kingdom in Henan province, in Anyang. The site at Anyang contained a vast collection of ancient objects, including over 150,000 oracle bones.Zhengzhou which is in Henan, some 50 miles east of the earlier Erlitou site, is another example of an early Shang city. Archaeologist Han Weizhou stumbled upon the site in 1950. In 1951, collected specimens confirmed the Shang dynasty connection. The city was found to be older than the Shang city of Yinxu in Anyang.Factors That Led to Its DownfallA pit at Yinxu containing oracle bones ceremonially buried after divinationThe formidable Shang army propelled the growth of the kingdom and made use of advanced bronze weapons while continually recruiting foot soldiers in order to preserve its strength. Archaeological remains point to a dominant military institution that waged wars against its neighbors. The army used skilled chariot teams to raid enemy towns and capture thousands of prisoners for ritual killings on a large scale.Later Chinese dynasties moved away from this type of warfare as it was highly brutal and unnecessary. As the Shang dynastys control over its neighbors weakened due to internal issues, the Zhou dynasty eventually launched a successful attack to overthrow the Shang. The Shang Dynasty was finally usurped about 1050 BCE.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 6 Visualizações