By Blessing Nweke The nearly $1.8 billion Powerball jackpot finally found its winners during Saturday nights drawing, the Multi-State Lottery Association confirmed. The massive $1.787 billion prizethe

By Blessing Nweke Hurricane Kiko is gradually weakening in the central Pacific Ocean, but it remains a powerful storm capable of producing life-threatening surf conditions for Hawaii early this week.

By Gloria Ogbonna President Donald Trump issued a stark ultimatum to Hamas on Sunday, declaring that the terrorist organization has one final opportunity to accept a U.S.-brokered hostage deal before

Please share our story! AI company Anthropic has agreed to create a $1.5 billion fund to compensate authors whose works it used to train its models without permission. The fund is part of a proposed

Top O' the BriefingHappy Monday, dear Kruiser Morning Briefing friends. Lactose intolerance is never seen in public with peanut allergies or Whitesnake tribute bands. Advertisement There is a lot

The universe exists because matter and antimatter are not good friends.

King George IV, the last monarch of Britains Georgian era (1714-1830), filled his time with the pursuit of pleasure. His vice-coated lifestyle was notorious and expensive, putting unnecessary financial pressure on the shoulders of the British Parliament.This made him a deeply unpopular monarch and the perfect example of a rich, out-of-touch royal who cared little for the affairs of the state. Though he did have some redeeming qualities, King George IV will always be remembered as the lastand worstof the Georgian kings.King George IVs UpbringingKing George IV; Frederick, Duke of York and Albany by Robert Laurie, 1772. Source: National Portrait GalleryGeorge arrived on August 12, 1762. He was the first of fifteen children (thirteen of whom reached adulthood) and spent most of his childhood in royal villas, especially the seventeenth-century lodge in Richmond Park, London.During his younger years, George was close to the second-eldest brother in the family, Frederick. There was only a year between the two boys, and they shared the same educational curriculum.While his reputation may suggest otherwise, George was not unintelligent. By the time he reached manhood, he could speak several languages, including Hebrew, and was capable of playing the piano and the cello. He also inherited a love of architecture from his father, King George III, who had learned much from the Scottish architect William Chambers.Yet it didnt take long for Georges rebellious nature to appear. With Frederick now over in Hanover and William (the third-eldest brother) going off into the navy, George started to miss the company of lads his own age. Whats more, unlike future kings-in-waiting, George lacked a constitutional role. He simply had no other purpose other than to wait for his father to die, and this lack of purpose opened the door for his decadent ways.The RebelPrinceMary Robinson by John Keyse Sherwin, 1781. Source: National Portrait GalleryBy the time he was in his late teens, George had already developed a taste for the ladies.One of his earliest romances was with a young woman named Mary Hamilton. Several years older than the teenage prince, Mary was the governess of Georges sisters and the great-granddaughter of the Duke of Wellington.But it wasnt a balanced relationship. While Mary was interested in friendship, George developed a passionate, albeit brief, obsession. He pursued her tirelessly, writing letters, sending bits of his hair, and making promises of marriage. The prince soon changed targets, however.During a trip to the theater in December 1779, George locked his sights on the actress and poet Mary Darby Robinson. Before long, the relationship became serious. Mary became Georges first public mistress despite being married (though unhappily) to Thomas Robinson. But it didnt take long for the young prince to grow tired of Mary, so he turned his attention to Elizabeth Armistead next.Georges temperamental attitude towards women remained throughout his life, with these early scandals being the start of his addiction to infidelity.A HatefulMarriagePrincess Caroline of Brunswick-Wolfenbttel by Thomas Lawrence, 1804. Source: National Portrait GalleryNow a man in his early twenties, George received a whopping allowance of 50,000 a year and spent his time in Carlton House, London. But George wasnt careful with his money at all.Having moved into the aforementioned royal residence, the prince commissioned the leading architect Henry Holland to make expensive renovations. With a large chunk of the yearly allowance already gone, King George III was not impressed when he heard what his son had done.In the spring of 1784, the Prince met Maria Fitzherbert, a wealthy Catholic widow who was six years his senior. George fell madly in love with Maria, and the two of them married in secret in December 1785.However, the Royal Marriage Act made the ceremony unlawful, for the prince was under the age of twenty-five and did not have consent from his father. Maria thought otherwise. She saw the union as sacred and binding, as it had been solemnized by a Catholic priest. The marriage remained a guarded secret, and Maria remained in her own separate residences in London and Brighton.Another marriage took place in 1795, with George marrying his older cousin, Caroline of Brunswick. This marriage was a disaster. Caroline, who was a high-spirited woman, had expected a dazzling life with the future King of Great Britain. But she spent most of her time cooped up with ladies-in-waiting, and on the rare occasions she did see her husband, he was often drunk or in a foul mood.Despite the hostilities, the couple did produce a daughter: Princess Charlotte, who was born on January 7, 1796.The Madness of King GeorgeIIIKing George III by William Beechey, c. 1800. Source: National Portrait GalleryPrincess Charlottes arrival did nothing to bring the couple closer together. Though they remained husband and wife, the two of them separated.The king, meanwhile, was plagued with mental decline, suffering five distinct bouts of madness between 1788 and 1809. Its difficult for historians to know the precise nature of the illness, but it was probably a hereditary disorder known as porphyria. Victims suffer from hallucinations, weak limbs, and paranoia.Due to his fathers mental decline, George was forced to step up. In 1811, he officially became the prince regent. George was forty-eight years old at the time and already dangerously overweight, thanks to a diet loaded with meat, alcohol, and sugar.Shortly after becoming the prince regent, George hosted a celebration at Carlton House. With approximately two thousand guests (including the exiled French royal family), the event featured a lavish meal with an abundance of fruit, roasts, and champagne.A Voluptuary Under the Horrors of Digestion (King George IV) by James Gillray, 1792. Source: National Portrait GalleryUnlike his father, George preferred to take the backseat when it came to politics, staying in Brighton while his ministers dealt with the details and practicalities in London. The Brighton Pavilion, with its Great Kitchen run by the French chef Antonin Carme, was a heavenly retreat for the prince regent.However, there were some responsibilities. One of Georges first moves was allowing the Tories to continue their ministry. He believed stability was preferable when his fathers health was so fragile. This came as a surprise, for George had previously expressed support for the Whigs.Though only fifteen years of age, Princess Charlotte disagreed with her fathers decision, for she favored the Whigs over the Tories.Death andScandalThe Trial of Queen Caroline 1820 by George Hayter, 1820. Source: National Portrait GalleryIn May 1812, British politics suffered a heavy blow when a gunman assassinated Prime Minister Spencer Perceval in the lobby outside the House of Commons. The prince regent, hoping to give the country some stability, appointed Lord Liverpool as his new prime minister, who remained in this position for fifteen years.Five years later, another tragedy rocked the prince regent. After suffering several miscarriages, Princess Charlottes third conception led to a fifty-hour labor and a stillborn child. Convulsions took hold of the princess soon after, and she died on November 6, 1817, at the age of twenty-one.Mad King George died a couple of years later on January 29, 1820, marking the end of the Regency era and the start of King George IVs ten-year reign. Unfortunately, things went downhill almost immediately due to the Queen Caroline Affair.After more than twenty years of a hate-fuelled marriage, George wanted a divorce from Caroline, who was now Queen Caroline. It was most irregular for a monarch to divorce their spouse, but despite this, George was offered a way out thanks to the Pains and Penalties Bill.This bill allowed George to divorce Caroline if he could prove she was an adulterer. The irony, of course, was that George had engaged in many well-known extramarital affairs during the marriage. This hypocrisy made the public turn away from their new monarch and side with Queen Caroline instead.Though the bill managed to get through the House of Lords, it stood no chance of getting through the House of Commons due to the wave of disapproval from the public. Queen Caroline kept her titles and her honor while her husband sank into a hole of embarrassment.Tours, Art and ArchitectureKing George IV by Thomas Woolnoth, c. 1820. Source: National Portrait GalleryKing George IVs coronation was held on July 19, 1821, in Westminster Abbey, London. True to form, George wanted the event to be coated in luxury and forced Parliament to rustle up 100,000 for the festivities. (Queen Caroline, despite her position, was barred from attending.)Following the service in Westminster Abbey, the newly-crowned monarch and his fellow guests moved into Westminster Hall for the coronation banquet. The meal was ridiculously expensive, coming with a price tag of 250,000 and two thousand guests. The king also received lots of gifts, including two live falcons from the Duke of Atholl!A month after the coronation, the king went on a tour of Ireland, becoming the first British monarch to visit since 1690. George visited many well-known landmarks, including Phoenix Park, Dublin Castle, Trinity College, and the Bank of Ireland.The king visited Scotland a year later, staying in Dalkeith Palace outside the city of Edinburgh. It had been almost two hundred years since a British monarch had visited Scotland. During the visit, George was received at the Palace of Holyroodhouse, with the Scottish artist David Wilkie painting a portrait of the king. George also attended a Highland ball, visited the theater, and went on a procession down the Royal Mile.Palace of Holyroodhouse. Source: XtoF / Wikimedia CommonsGeorges interest in politics was still small during his reign. However, its worth mentioning the Catholic Emancipation Act of 1829, for it allowed Catholics to vote and sit in Parliament. George had been reluctant to sign the legislation at first. But after the Duke of Wellington threatened to retire his Tory government, George changed his mind.While he had little interest in politics, the king loved art and culture. Both before and during his reign, he had a particular liking for Dutch and Flemish paintings and assembled a wonderful collection of pieces. George served as a patron for some of the greatest artists of the era, including George Stubbs, Thomas Gainsborough, and David Wilkie.When it came to architecture, the king ordered the rebuilding of Buckingham House into a palace. As with Brighton Pavilion, this project was overseen by the architect John Nash. George also worked with the architect Jeffry Wyatville, who changed Windsor Castle with his Gothic style of architecture.King George IVs Death andLegacyGeorge IV by Thomas Lawrence, 1821. Source: Royal Collection TrustAfter decades of rich and fattening food, the kings health was not ideal.Dropsy (a condition that had also affected Queen Anne during her reign) caused parts of Georges body to swell with fluid. Gout also prevented the king from signing documents, so his attendants had to use a stamp of his signature instead. Worse still, he suffered from cataracts, meaning he was severely blind towards the end of his reign.Soon, the inevitable happened. George died at the age of 67 on June 26, 1830, after rupturing a blood vessel in his stomach. He weighed 24 stone (over 300 pounds) at the time of his death, and the post-mortem also found large fatty deposits around the kings heart.Georges legacy is not particularly positive. While he deserves praise for funding some exceptional artistic and architectural projects, his gluttonous lifestyle will always overshadow his achievements.Even as a teenager, George pursued a life of vice, with food, drink, and women being the big three. The scale of his pleasurable pursuits was a problem, for Parliament had to fund his lifestyle. This led to a considerable amount of dislike from the public, and the dislike only increased with the Queen Caroline Affair in 1820.Though he had some commendable qualities, George IV left behind a poor legacy, and he will always sit in the bottom tier of British monarchs.

The Cold War became chillier in 1949 when the communists won the Chinese Civil War, giving the Soviet Union a major new ally. During the reign of Soviet Premier Joseph Stalin, Red China was a loyal friend to Soviet communism. To help their mostly agrarian ally develop more quickly, the Soviets sent aid, equipment, and technical advisers to China. However, by 1960 the relationship between China and the USSR was growing icy. Nine years later, there was real fear that war might erupt between the two powers, by then both armed with nuclear weapons. How did the two largest communist powers go from friend to foe?Setting the Stage: Communism in ChinaA photograph of a monument commemorating the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Source: the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA).Communism as a modern concept was created in 1848 by political philosopher Karl Marx in Germany with the publication of The Communist Manifesto. In October 1917, the Communist Revolution, also known as the Bolshevik Revolution, and Russian Revolution, erupted in St. Petersburg, Russia. For the next five years, the Russian Civil War raged as Bolsheviks, communist revolutionaries, fought to establish a communist nation-state. By the end of 1922, the Soviet Union had been created, encompassing all of Russia and several smaller bordering states. One of the Soviet Unions official goals during its early era was the international spread of communism to end the exploitation of the working class.China, which borders eastern Russia, saw the official creation of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in July 1921. Since 1918, many intellectuals in China had been following the events of the Russian Civil War and preceding Bolshevik Revolution, and in April 1920 a representative from Comintern (The Communist International organization of the USSR) first visited China to explore expanding the revolution. The First National Congress of the CCP was held in late July and early August of 1921, and in January and February of 1922 delegates from the CCP attended a Comintern event in Moscow.Setting the Stage: The Chinese Civil War (1927-49)A June 1945 map showing Communist activity in China shortly before the resurgence of the Chinese Civil War after World War II. Source: The National Archives (UK).Communism increased in popularity in China, mostly in the northern regions near the Soviet Union. In 1926, the communists entered into an alliance with the Nationalists, led by General Chiang Kai-Shek, to restore order in rural areas dominated by local warlords. The Nationalists broke this alliance the following year and turned on the communists, sparking the Chinese Civil War. Four years later, the Japanese invasion of Manchuria (northeastern China) after the false flag Mukden Incident brought about a short-lived truce between the Nationalists and the Communists.Unfortunately, the Nationalists continued to use resources initially marked for halting Japanese expansion against the Communists. The Communists gained popularity during World War II as they were considered to more actively fight the Japanese than Chiang Kai-Shek, whose wartime performance was strongly criticized by American general Joseph Stilwell. After World War II ended, the Chinese Civil War resurged with a vengeance now that a truce between the two factions was no longer necessary. Although the Nationalists received aid from the United States, the Communists enjoyed strong public support outside the major cities and were able to seize much abandoned Japanese equipment and weaponry in Manchuria.1949-53: Soviet Aid to Red China Under StalinA Chinese postage stamp from 1950 showing Soviet premier Joseph Stalin (left) shaking hands with Chinese premier Mao Zedong (right). Source: Wikimedia CommonsIn October 1949, the Communists seized power in Beijing and the Nationalists fled to the island of Formosa, which they renamed Taiwan and declared themselves the Republic of China (ROC). The Peoples Republic of China (PRC), often known as Red China in the West, had won the Chinese Civil War with copious amounts of aid from the neighboring Soviet Union. Many blamed the administration of US President Harry Truman for losing China to communism. In less than a year, North Koreas invasion of South Korea heated up the Cold War, with Communist North Korea backed by the Soviet Union and Red China and South Korea backed by the United States and Britain.The Korean War, which lasted from June 1950 to July 1953, saw the Soviet Union encourage Chinese aid of North Korea, which directly bordered Manchuria. While Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin provided volunteer fighter pilots to aid North Korea, the Chinese sent almost a million ground troops in autumn 1950 when U.S. forces approached the Yalu River border between North Korea and China. The lack of stronger direct Soviet support for North Korea, and relying more on Chinese manpower, may have initiated tensions between the two communist powers.1954-59: Soviet Aid to Red China Under KhrushchevSoviet premier Nikita Khrushchev (far left) with Chinese premier Mao Zedong (second from left). Source: The National Interest.Joseph Stalin passed away shortly before the end of the Korean War, after the front had stabilized at its current border known as the Demilitarized Zoneor DMZbetween North and South Korea. His eventual successor, Nikita Khrushchev, continued Soviet support for Red China. Khrushchev visited his Chinese counterpart, Communist revolutionary leader Mao Zedong, in China (Mao had previously gone to the USSR to visit Stalin). Since the death of Stalin, however, a new type of technological aid presented complications: nuclear energy.A Chinese poster from the 1950s showing a Soviet worker (left) and a Chinese worker (right) collaborating. Source: the Hoover Institution.Initially, the Soviets helped the Chinese with nuclear research, ostensibly for peaceful purposes. By 1957, Mao was demanding assistance with nuclear weapons research, which the USSR provided with a single sample bomb and its data. Despite having signed a Treaty of Friendship and Alliance in 1950 that was to last for thirty years, the two communist powers quickly had their differences over this nuclear cooperation. As China grew and developed, thanks largely to trade with the Soviet Union and economic aid from the same source, a power struggle emerged. Was the USSR providing enough aid in good faith, and did China have to blindly accept its neighbors policies?The Sino-Soviet SplitA poster of Communist leaders (left-to-right) Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Vladimir Lenin, and Joseph Stalin. Source: Salt Research.By the late 1950s, a rift was growing between Soviet and Chinese philosophies about international communism and engagement. The USSR was more technologically advanced, urbanized, and integrated into trade with the West. The Khrushchev Thaw had led to warmer relations with the United States and Britain, whose involvement in the Korean War and imperialist pasts upset many Chinese leaders. Additionally, Khrushchevs policy of de-Stalinization upset Mao, who had viewed Stalin as a powerful ally. As the Soviet Union liberalized under Khrushchev, China believed that it was abandoning the principles of Marxism.Thus, Mao embarked on the Great Leap Forward, where he pursued mass industrialization. This was an economic failure and a humiliation for the rising power, and likely deepened the rift with the Soviet Union. Mao had intended the program to achieve true communism before the Soviet Union, but instead sparked mass starvation as farmers had been diverted to ill-planned, small-scale industrial projects that generated little output. In 1960, the Sino-Soviet Split formally occurred at the Moscow conference of world communist parties, where China and Albania argued that the USSR had given up class struggle.1960-69: Growing Tensions Between USSR and ChinaAn 1870s Russian map showing the Ussuri River border between the Manchuria region of China and Russia, over which a 1969 border conflict erupted. Source: Library of Congress.The split widened during the 1960s, with each power blaming the other for violating the true principles of Marxism. Each disagreed with the others foreign policy decisions in the early 1960s, with China viewing the USSR as weak during the Cuban Missile Crisis and the USSR criticizing Chinas actions during the 1962 Sino-Indian War. China, which was actively working on building its first nuclear weapons, saw Soviet agreements with the West on nuclear weapons controls as a betrayal. Although Khrushchev was removed from power in the Soviet Union in 1964, the Chinese did not view his successor, Leonid Brezhnev, as a true Marxist either.Both powers supported communist North Vietnam during the Vietnam War, though more support came from the Soviet Union. Their disagreement over Vietnam War policy widened the rift further, and by 1969 the two communist powers were even on the brink of war themselves. Allegedly, the Soviet intervention in Prague, Czechoslovakia in 1968 frightened Mao, who believed that the USSR might attack other communist nations even his own. In March 1969, Soviet and Chinese border guards began shooting at each other along the Ussuri River between Chinese Manchuria and Soviet Siberia.1969-1970s: Sino-Soviet Split Leads to DtenteA photograph of Beijing, China, where the portrait of Chinese Communist Party Chairman Mao Zedong is on display. Source: PBS.The border conflict between China and the Soviet Union presented a Cold War opportunity to the United States, which could play the two powers against each other. New US President Richard Nixon, elected in 1968, continued the Vietnam War but began reaching out to communist China. The Soviets, aware of this and fearing increased international support for Red China, pursued warmer relations with the US as well. This began the era of dtente, or warmer Cold War relations between the Soviet Union and the West. Fearing that China could aid the West in a potential conflict with the USSR, the Soviets wanted to avoid such a conflict.In February 1972, Nixon famously visited Mao Zedong in Beijing to re-establish diplomatic relations. Most international recognition of China switched from the Republic of China (Taiwan) to the Peoples Republic of China, reducing use of the term Red China to differentiate the two. Nixon went on a foreign policy hot streak, ending US involvement in the Vietnam War a year later and signing arms reduction treaties with the Soviet Union. Due to continued poor relations with China over the shared border during the 1970s, the Soviets wanted to maintain diplomatic support from the West.End of Cold War: USSR and China Re-Establish RelationsA photograph of Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev (left) shaking hands with Chinese Premier Deng Xiaoping (right) in Beijing in May 1989. Source: Foreign PolicyThe Cold War re-chilled in December 1979 with the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, ending detente. At the same time, China began opening up to foreign investment under Premier Deng Xiaoping. Roughly six years later, the Soviet Union began to follow a similar path with the emergence of Premier Mikhail Gorbachev. Under Gorbachev, the Soviet economy relaxed restrictions on private ownership and foreign investment with its Glasnost and Perestroika reforms. In May 1989, Gorbachev visited China, becoming the first Soviet leader to do so since the Sino-Soviet Split of 1960.However, during Gorbachevs summit came a sharp break in strategies on how to handle public calls for democracy: while the USSR continued to allow democratic reforms, China quashed its own reform movements with the infamous Tiananmen Square Massacre. Gorbachevs visit improved Soviet relations with China, but the accompanying media took an increased interest in the actions of the Chinese government. The violent repression of protesters by the Chinese military met with condemnation from the US government and sanctions were put in place.Post-Cold War: China Torn Between West and RussiaChinese President Hu Jintao (left) walks with United States President George W. Bush (right) in France at a G8 economic summit in 2003. Source: The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).Although Gorbachevs policy of nonviolence toward democratic reformers was praised by the West, the Soviet Union ultimately collapsed two years later. China, meanwhile, retained its firm insistence on one-party rule. During the 1990s, the two Asian powers saw their fortunes reverse: Russia, successor state of the USSR, faced a faltering post-Soviet economy while China enjoyed rapid economic growth due to international trade. However, Chinas strict maintenance of Communist rule clashed with Western desires for multi-party democracy.Since the early 2000s, China has been considered a rising superpower and became the 2nd largest economy in the world in 2010, surpassing Japan. Economically, it desires strong trade ties to the West. Politically, it remains closer to authoritarian Russia and communist North Korea. This dichotomy has created tension and left China torn between its pro-(Soviet) Russia past and a pro-Western (economic) future. True to its Communist roots, China has long criticized the West for colonialism and economic exploitation, making it difficult to embrace the West. Thus, Russia is often seen as a valuable sociopolitical counterweight.Modern Challenges: Russo-Ukrainian War and North Koreas Nuclear WeaponsNorth Korean leader Kim Jong Un (left) shaking hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin (right). Source: Wikimedia CommonsSince 2014, tensions between the West and Russia have surged following the Russian annexation of the Crimean Peninsula in Ukraine. Similarly, continued North Korean nuclear weapon and missile tests have increased tensions as well. In February 2022, these combined tensions soared further with the Russian invasion of Ukraine, starting the Russo-Ukrainian War. North Korea has announced its support for Russia, while China has tried to hedge on its support to maintain trade ties with the West. The West has accused China of aiding Russia in the war, threatening trade ties further in light of increased scrutiny of the effects of low-cost Chinese exports on domestic economies.The West has encouraged China to break with Russia and North Korea and apply diplomatic and economic pressure to end their aggressions. Thus far, China has avoided taking a firm stance. Although China has criticized some North Korean nuclear actions, and joined with some United Nations resolutions to apply economic sanctions on the Communist state, it is debatable how firmly China upholds its implementation of these sanctions on its historic ally. The Sino-Soviet Split likely aided the peaceful resolution of the Cold War by preventing an unstoppable Communist alliance, and may help keep the peace today by preventing China from fully allying with Russia in the current war in Ukraine.

The allure of Indian textiles during the Victorian era was more than just fashionit was a symbol of status, culture, and imperial dominance. As the British Empire crept at the edges of its borders, growing larger and ever stronger, so too did the fascination with the luxurious fabrics produced by Indian weavers and embroiderers. These fabrics became a staple of Victorian fashion, provided in a monopoly by the East India Company, and adored for their exotic appeal and unparalleled craftsmanship.What Was the British East India Company?Flag of the British East India Company. Source: Wikimedia CommonsThe East India Company, established in 1600 under the indomitable Queen Elizabeth, was not just a trading enterprise, it was a powerful force that shaped the economic and political landscapes of both Britain and India. Initially focused on the Silk Road spice trade, the company quickly expanded its reach to include the lucrative textile industry. Indian fabrics, known for their quality and intricate designs that were incredibly time-consuming for fabric artisans to produce, were in high demand in fashionable European circles. The company exploited this demand by establishing monopolies over guilds and individual artisans, often at the expense of the local culture and economy.The East India Companys control over Indian textile production and shipping allowed it to dominate the global market, exporting vast quantities of cotton, silk, and muslin to Britain. This trade not only enriched the company but also played a significant role in British ideas of superiority and the right to rule, contributing to the wealth and power of the empire all while the makers of the fabrics were heavily taxed and often bullied into not selling their goods to those who would buy them at market value.Who Were the Indian Weavers and Embroiderers?Painted Textile Depicting Celestial Musicians, India (Gujarat), 16th-17th century. Source: The MET, New YorkThe East India Companys (EIC) control over India deeply reduced the quality of life for the Indian weavers and embroiderers, who had long been revered for their exceptional skill. Each region in India boasted its own unique weaving traditions, with Gujarat on the West Coast emerging as a major hub of innovation for over five centuries. As Gujarati weavers migrated, they spread their intricate techniques across the subcontinent. From simple back-strap loomsmade of sticks, rope, and a simple harness worn around the weavers waistto complex draw-loomscapable of creating ikat blurs and patterned silksthese artisans were masters of their craft, a craft they had inherited from fathers and grandfathers who passed along trade secrets for generations.The textiles they produced were not merely functional, they were works of art that demonstrated the wealth and power of Indias rulers before colonization as well as the rareness of the resources of the tropical monsoon climate. In the royal workshops of Gujarat, weavers crafted elaborate silks adorned with human, animal, and floral designs. These designs graced the nobility at the Mughal Court, a place where the East India Company first sent ambassadors to get the lay of the gem-like land. However, at this time India wasnt a single unified thing but a collection of kingdoms and several princely states. The Deccan region was known for its meticulously hand-drawn and dyed cotton, used for courtly clothing and furnishings and finer than any produced elsewhere, while the Mughal imperial workshops produced lavish floral and figural wall hangings, often inspired by Chinese and Iranian designs.Mans robe, Mughal, 17th century. Source: The MET, New YorkDespite the artistry and skill involved, weavers and embroiderers faced severe exploitation under the East India Company. The EIC sought to police the global fabric trade, holding at bay other European kingdoms that had a foothold nearby. To do so, the EIC imposed oppressive conditions on Indian artisans. These craftsmen were often forced to sell their goods at extremely low prices while being burdened with heavy taxation.In some cases, the EIC would even destroy looms and or cut fabric from the frames as they neared completion, ensuring the craftsmen remained dependent on the company. This exploitation led to a sharp decline in the traditional weaving industry and the lifestyle it had once afforded its artists, as the artisans struggled to survive in the face of the EICs viciousness.The carving of printing blocks, another highly skilled practice, also suffered under the EICs dominance. Craftsmen at workshops turned rough cuts of wood into intricately carved printing blocks, a process requiring immense precision but one that made it possible for a pattern to be replicated again and again for a century or more. However, the English met this time-consuming craft with a process of their own with the rise of mechanization and the introduction of the Jacquard loom in the 19th century. Thus printed fabric became faster and less costly to make, resulting in traditional methods being increasingly sidelined and undervalued.Depiction of Job Charnock. Source: Wikimedia CommonsThe impact of Indian textiles extended beyond European fashionthey played a crucial role in establishing connections between the British East India Company (EIC) and local communities. Marriage alliances were one such means of forging these connections. For instance, Job Charnock, a prominent member of the EIC, married an Indian woman named Maria, who greatly influenced his success.Unlike many who looked down on the Indian natives and their traditions, Charnock adopted many local customs, including wearing Indian clothing and converting to Hinduism, which earned him respect within the community and eased trade negotiations. However, back at home in England, Charnock was derided for putting aside the privileges and honors of being a tried and true Brit. The influence of Indian women, like Maria, in shaping the fortunes of the EIC highlights the deep intertwining of culture, commerce, and craftsmanship during this period.The EICs exploitation had devastating effects on Indias rich textile heritage. The demand for cheaper, mass-produced goods led to the decline of traditional weaving practices. Yet, despite these challenges, the legacy of Indian weavers and embroiderers endures, their skills preserved in the surviving museum pieces that continue to inspire awe for their artistry and craftsmanship.Why Victorian Women So Desired Indian FabricWomen in Kashmir Shawls, by John Singer Sargent, 1908. Source: Wikimedia CommonsVictorian women were captivated by Indian fabrics for several reasons, many of which stemmed from the limitations of textile production in England. The lightweight, breathable materials produced by Indian weavers were unmatched in their quality and comfort, especially compared to the heavier, coarser fabrics produced in Britain.English mills simply couldnt replicate the delicate muslins, luxurious silks, and finely woven cotton that flowed from Indian looms. No one who had been forced to wear itchy wool or rough homespun could compare the experience to donning Indias flowing, eye-catching fabrics. This made Indian textiles highly coveted by British women, who sought out these fabrics for their beauty, comfort, and exotic allure.Beyond the fabric itself, Indian influences permeated nearly every aspect of Victorian society, reflecting the deep ties between Britain and its cash cow colony. The fascination with India could be seen in so very many aspects of English life, like the teas the landed gentry sipped and even the spices used in holiday cakes.Indian textiles, especially the Kashmir shawl, became symbols of status and fashion in Britain. Since the mid-18th century, British women had worn these shawls to provide a touch of warmth over their short-sleeved, lightweight dresses. Over time, the Kashmir shawl evolved into a marker of respectability and taste, yet its high cost placed it well beyond the reach of all but the wealthiest tier of women.Bed Cover (Palampore), India, 18th century. Source: The MET, New YorkIn stark contrast to Britain, where sumptuary laws and written codes limited what was considered appropriate for those on different rungs of the social ladder to wear, Indian society had no such formal strictures. Instead, fashion norms were spread through word of mouth among Indias communities, allowing for a more fluid and diverse expression of style. This freedom, combined with the unmatched quality of Indian fabrics, made them even more desirable to British trendsetters.The appeal of Indian textiles wasnt just about their physical qualitiesit was also about the cultural mystique they carried, representing a world that was both fascinating and nearly impossible to imagine in dreary England.As Indian fabrics became more integrated into British fashion, they helped to shape a broader view of the world and peoples place within it, where the influences of the subcontinent were visible in everything from the patterns on a ladys dress to the spices in her cupboard. This blending of cultures, for better or worse, spoke volumes about the complex and unequal relationship between Britain and India during the Victorian Era, where admiration for Indian artistry coexisted with the degradation of its people and resources.The Peacock Dress and the Rise of the Anglo-IndianLady Curzon wearing the Peacock Dress created for her in 1903 by the House of Worth, by William Logsdale, 1909. Source: Art UKThe Peacock Dress, a now famous symbol of English wealth made in India and commissioned by Lady Curzon, epitomizes the fusion of British and Indian aesthetics during the British occupation of India. This opulent garment is celebrated for its intricate gold and silver embroidery and beetle wing-decorated feather motifs.However, the true creators of this masterpieceskilled Indian artisans in the very earliest years of the 20th centuryare seldom acknowledged. These embroiderers, working under the constraints of colonial exploitation, were the unseen hands that crafted the fabric of the dress before it was sent for finishing at the House of Worth in France. Their artistry not only adorned the elite but also reflected the often exploitative dynamics between the colonizers and the colonized. Their stories remain largely untold, overshadowed by the dresss illustrious European patron.Much like each thread that makes up the peacock dress, Mary Wilsons story is a poignant illustration of the racial and social complexities of the colonial era. Mary was born in India to her English fathers native, long-term paramour. However, as her fathers time in India came to an end, he decided Mary would make the trip back to an England she didnt know to never again lay eyes on her mother or the country in which she had been born and raised.As the illegitimate mixed-race daughter of Sir Henry Russell, a prominent British official in India, Mary was brought to England under circumstances that exemplify both the privileges and tragedies of her background. Her father refused to travel with her, instead requesting that a friend supervise her on a less well-appointed ship. She never stepped foot in her fathers stately home but was sent to a girls school.Red Ensign of the British Raj. Source: Wikimedia CommonsDespite being educated and trained as a governess, Mary was kept at a distance from her fathers legitimate family, who seemed unaware of her existence. Henry Russell provided for her but never acknowledged her publicly, leaving Mary in a state of perpetual uncertainty about her identity and heritage. Mary remembered bits and pieces of her early life, asked questions about her mother and how she got to England and received only silence in response. Even when she was proposed to by an upstanding junior clergyman, the marriage negotiations were prolonged by her father refusing to claim her and her having nothing to write in the registry under her fathers name.It should be noted that this marriage was considered largely above her position as an illegitimate governess but far, far below what Sir Henry Russell would accept for his legitimate, white daughters. The marriage did go through and was a resounding success that produced several children that identified as white including Amelia Selina, who was governess to Algernon Henry Barkworth, a first class passenger on the Titanic.First Class: The Meetingand at First Meeting Loved, by Abraham Solomon, 1854. Source: Wikimedia CommonsMarys experience parallels the plight of the Peacock Dress artisans: both were significant yet sidelined by the dominant historical narrative. Marys struggle to reconcile her origins with her social reality underscores the broader themes of exclusion and identity faced by mixed-race individuals during this period.Mary Emmons, a woman from Calcutta who entered the historical records as a servant in his household but became the partner of Aaron Burr and mother to two of his children while his better-known wife, Theodosia, was dying, adds another dimension to this narrative. Like the artisans and Mary Wilson, Emmonss contributions have been obscured by the more prominent figures in her life. Little is known about her journey to America or her personal experiences, despite her integral role in Burrs household and her significant impact on his family. It is through her line, not that of Theodosias, that Aaron Burrs descendants continue on. Yet, we dont know what brought her from India to the new world, how she came to be in service, or even where she is buried.Mary Emmons story highlights the often invisible roles played by women of color, particularly in mixed-race relationships or in servitude. Her life, much like those of the Peacock Dress artisans and Mary Wilson, reflects a broader pattern of historical erasure and undervaluation.Victoria Becomes Empress of IndiaQueen Victoria, by George Hayter, 1838-40. Source: Wikimedia CommonsWhen Queen Victoria was proclaimed Empress of India in 1876, it marked the formalization of British rule over the subcontinent and the symbolic merging of British and Indian cultures. It also heralded the end of the East India Company, which had to cede control of the land to Victorias more morally brittle and staunchly upright authority.This empresshood not only solidified Victorias position as a global monarch but also intensified the cultural exchange between Britain and India. Indian textiles, which had already been popular in Britain, became even more significant as symbols of the empires reach and influence. The Empresss own wardrobe began to include more Indian-inspired garments, further popularizing these fabrics among the British aristocracy. Victorias fascination with India also led to the commissioning of Indian artisans to create textiles for the royal household, thus ensuring the continued prominence of Indian fabrics in British fashion.It wasnt just the lovely fabrics imported from India that Victoria admired. In June 1887, a weary and long-widowed Queen Victoria, then 68, met a tall, bearded young man in a scarlet tunic and snowy turban. Abdul Karim, just 23, knelt to kiss her feet, and Victoria somehow bonded with this wholly unusual young man. Karim had been sent from Agra as a human present to serve at the queens table and ease the way for some of her meetings with those in positions of influence in India. However, their connection quickly transcended the roles they were meant to play. Victoria, drawn to Karims presence, soon had him teaching her Urdu, elevating him from what some dismissively called a kitchen boy to her trusted Munshi or tutor.Karim and the Queen. Source: Rare Historical PhotosOver the next 13 years, despite loud and race-fueled protestations, Abdul Karim remained by the Empresss side, even accompanying her to her private cottage in the Scottish Highlands. While their bond was scandalous to the royal household it was maternal to the queen who had often failed to act with warmth toward her own children. Yet this friendship had more than just personal implications; it also left a lasting cultural mark. Karim introduced Victoria to Indian cuisine, notably serving her a meal of chicken curry, daal, and pilau, which she recorded in her diary with appreciation and set into the rotation of her favorite meals.Victorias relationship with India went beyond her bond with Karim. Though she never visited India herself, she brought valued tokens of the country to her royal residences. The Queen-Empress had Indian attendants, wore Indian jewels like the vaunted Koh-i-Noor diamond, and even added a Durbar Room to Osborne House, filled with Indian art and display-worthy valuables. Victorias symbolic reign over India was thus marked by both her personal connections and her public displays of affection for the country.Despite Victorias efforts to protect Karim, her fears of his mistreatment after her death were well reasoned. Her son and heir, Edward VII, quickly moved to erase Karims position, destroying the letters Victoria had written to him and sending him unhesitatingly back to India. However, the closeness between the Queen and her Munshi, immortalized in Victorias diaries and Karims own records, endures as a testament to this remarkable, if controversial, chapter in British colonial history.Are There Still Specialty Indian Weavers and Embroiderers?Old fashioned Loom in Varanasi. Source: Wikimedia CommonsDespite the challenges posed by colonialism, the tradition of Indian weaving and embroidery has endured to the present day, though it has evolved over time. Today, there are still communities of weavers and embroiderers in India who practice their craft, often with a renewed focus on preserving historical techniques and regional patterns. Organizations and cooperatives have been established to support these artisans, providing them with the resources and fair trade markets needed to sustain their livelihoods.While the global textile industry has shifted towards mass production, there remains a niche market for handwoven and truly one-of-a-kind Indian textiles, both within India and internationally. These artisans continue to produce fabrics that are celebrated for their quality, artistry, and cultural significance, ensuring that the legacy of the Indian textile industry endures despite the damage done to it during the British colonial period.

Best Samsung deal: Save $700 on 65-inch Samsung The Frame TV at Best Buy SAVE $700: As of Sept. 8, Best Buy's Deal of the Day is offering a 65-inch Samsung QLED 4K The Frame TV for $1,299.99. This is $700 off its list price of $1,999.99. Fall is a great time to pick up a new TV. Not only to watch the latest drops on streamers or to enjoy the start...