This is rich.Taylor Lorenz, one of the worst people in journalism, has chimed in on the cheating CEO and HR rep who were busted at a Coldplay concert. We told you about that here because it spawned a

A man protesting Israels presence in the Tour de France was swiftly and forcefully removed from the course by a security guard just 100 feet from the finish line of the 11th stage. The incident occurred

Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard released overwhelming evidence that the Obama administration manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork for what was

Homers Iliad tells the story of the Trojan War. Traditionally, that war has been dated to the late Bronze Age, approximately c. 1200 BCE. However, the Iliad itself was not written that early in history. There is wide agreement that Homeror whoever the true author of the Iliad waslived much, much later than this. Nevertheless, there is still disagreement over when exactly the Iliad was written. There are two main opinions between which scholars are divided. One opinion is that it was written in the 8th century BCE, while the other suggests it is more recent, written in the 7th century BCE.The Controversy Over When the Iliad Was WrittenWrath of Achilles, by Michel Martin Drolling, 1810. Source: Wikimedia CommonsThe date of the Trojan War is usually held to correspond almost exactly with the end of the Bronze Age, which also marked the end of the Mycenaean Era. That was in the 12th century BCE. After that, Greece entered the Dark Ages, until it finally entered the Archaic Era in c. 750 BCE. Since the Iliad tells the story of the Trojan War, it obviously must have been written after the date of that event, if we assume it really happened. However, already by c. 600 BCE, there is evidence of recognition of Homer as a poet. This suggests that the Iliad must have been written before then at the latest.This is a very wide window of opportunity in which the Iliad could have been written. Is there any way of narrowing it down? One way is by looking at ancient statements that explicitly state when Homer, the Iliads alleged author, lived. Since he was famous, even in ancient times, there are many statements about this.Statue of Herodotus at Bodrum, Turkey. Source: Wikimedia CommonsThe earliest direct statement regarding the date for the life of Homer comes from Herodotus. In his Histories II.53, Herodotus stated the following:I suppose that the time of Hesiod and Homer was not more than four hundred years before my own.Herodotus was writing in about the middle of the 5th century BCE. Hence, this claim would mean that Homer and Hesiod, a chronicler of Greek mythology, lived in about the middle of the 9th century, or about 850 BCE. This would mean that the Iliad was composed during the Dark Ages. While early in Greeces history, this is just about the time when the Greeks adopted the Phoenician script. Hence, it is plausible that the Iliad could have been preserved in writing not too long after Homer composed it.On the other hand, Herodotus estimates are not always reliable. Furthermore, he specifically says that Homer lived not more than four hundred years before his time. Hence, this could have been an upper limit rather than a realistic estimate about when he lived.Ancient Statements About the Life of HomerCapital from the tomb of Archilochus, Homers older contemporary, Paros Archaeological Museum. Source: Wikimedia CommonsThere are a variety of ancient claims about when Homer lived. True, these are later than Herodotus claim. However, the fact that Herodotus used the expression not more than four hundred years suggests that these other statements, which are more direct and specific, might be more useful. One example is the fact that an ancient writer named Demetrius of Magnesia placed Homer at about the same time as a poet named Thaletas, or Thales of Crete.Scholars widely agree that Thales lived in the mid-7th century BCE. The evidence for this is clear. Plutarch tells us that Thales lived in the generation after Terpander, who is recorded as winning the 26th Olympiad in the 670s BCE. This would place Thales in the latter half of the 7th century BCE. This is consistent with the fact that Glaucus of Rhegium, in the 5th century BCE, places Thales after Archilochus. This latter poet is known to have been active in the time of King Gyges of Lydia, in the first half of the 7th century.An Assyrian relief depicting mounted Cimmerian warriors, Nimrud, c. 13th century BCE. Source: Wikimedia CommonsTherefore, it is with good reason that Thales is generally placed by scholars in the mid-7th century BCE. Since Demetrius of Magnesia placed Homer at about the same time as Thales, this would likewise place Homer in that timeframe too. Demetrius of Magnesia lived in the 1st century BCE, which is long after Herodotus. Nevertheless, this date for Homerand thus the Iliadis supported by Strabo. While he was a contemporary of Demetrius, he referred to a group of previous writers, called simply the writers of chronicles. According to Strabo, they placed Homer at or just after the time of the Cimmerian invasions, referring to the invasion of western Anatolia; this would place Homer in the early to mid 7th century BCE.A date in this same century is supported by Theopompus in the 4th century BCE and Euporion in the following century, according to scholar Irene de Jong. For these and other reasons, many scholars believed that the Iliad was written at about this time.Evidence From Ancient Greek ArtworkAncient Greek pottery depicting scenes of the Trojan War. Source: Rob Koopman via FlickrOne corpus of evidence that strongly supports the conclusion that the Iliad was written later than commonly believed is ancient Greek artwork. Greek pottery famously tended to depict mythological events. From the early 7th century BCE onwards, we find depictions of the Trojan War. Some might try to use this as evidence that the Iliad was written before then, placing it within the 8th century BCE, thus allowing time for the poem to circulate.However, when we look at the evidence more closely, it is notable that we do not find any evidence of scenes specifically from the Iliad on Greek pottery at that early date. In fact, scenes specifically from Homers Iliad do not start to be depicted until the final quarter of the 7th century BCE. While perhaps this does not settle the matter definitively, it does argue very strongly in favor of a date no earlier than c. 650 BCE for the composition of the Iliad.Evidence From the Iliad ItselfAn Archaic bronze Corinthian helmet, c. 650-600 BCE. Source: Metropolitan Museum of Art, New YorkFurther evidence in support of this general dating comes from the Iliad itself. There are extensive descriptions of weapons, armor, and modes of warfare. By examining these features of the poem, we can ascertain roughly when the Iliad must have been written. The basis for this line of reasoning is that the style of weapons and armor, as well as how battles were fought, changed over the centuries.Regarding the armor that Homer describes, this fits the standard Greek hoplite equipment used from the late 8th century through the 7th century BCE. For example, the Iliad describes what appears to be the Corinthian helmet, with its plume of horsehair. The use of a bronze cuirass and a zostera broad metal beltalso requires a date in the late 8th or 7th century BCE. Such equipment did not exist prior to this. While this would allow for the Iliad to have been written as early as the late 8th century BCE, it cannot have been written earlier than that.Greek krater, Geometric period, c. 750-735 BCE. Source: Metropolitan Museum of Art, New YorkSomething which does help us to narrow down when the Iliad was written is the way in which Homer describes the use of swords, spears, and bows and arrows. This was shown by Hans van Wees. We can compare the Iliads descriptions with the depictions of the use of these weapons on Greek pottery. In depictions from the Geometric period, from 900 to 700 BCE, swords are shown as being the most commonly used weapon, with bows and arrows behind swords, and spears firmly in last place. This does not match the frequency with which Homer refers to these weapons.On the other hand, depictions dating to the first half of the 7th century BCE portray weapons with essentially the exact same frequency as Homer. Spears are shown to be by far the most common weapon, with swords almost never being shown. This corresponds perfectly to Homer, in complete contrast to the era prior to 700 BCE. Therefore, this provides strong evidence that the basis for Homers descriptions of warfare came from the first half of the 7th century BCE, and not the preceding century.Was the Iliad Written in the 8th or 7th Century BCE?Depiction of warfare from the Iliad, Codex F205, c. 500 CE. Source: Wikimedia CommonsIn conclusion, what do we know about when the Iliad was written? Herodotus stated that Homer lived no more than 400 years before his own time, but this was likely an upper limit and not a precise estimate. Most scholars date Homer in either the 8th or the 7th century BCE. As we have seen, there are a variety of ancient writers who placed Homer in the 7th century BCE, some of them suggesting that Homer lived in the middle of that century.The most important evidence comes from the Iliad itself and from ancient depictions of its scenes. The descriptions of weapons and armor in the Iliad are consistent with the late 8th century or 7th century BCE, but the use of different weapons points to a more specific era. The frequency of the use of spears compared to swords overwhelmingly supports a date after 700 BCE. Furthermore, the fact that scenes from the Iliad do not appear on Greek pottery until the last quarter of the 7th century BCE is important. This strongly suggests that it was written no earlier than about the middle of the 7th century BCE.

Among the kings of England there have been eight Henrys, eight Edwards, and six Georges but there has only ever been one John. His successors did not want to be associated with the stain the name had in the minds of the English people. Considering what the monk Matthew Paris penned (writing decades after Johns death) it is perhaps easy to see why. Foul as it is, Hell itself is made fouler by the presence of John. Is this a historical hit job, or was John really that terrible?SuccessionRichard I, the Lionheart, King of England, by Merry-Joseph Blondel, 1841 Source: Westminster AbbeyJohn was never supposed to be king. The youngest son of Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine, there were many in front of him in the line of succession to sit on the throne. But, in 1183 Henry the Young King died of dysentery. This was followed by his brother Geoffrey dying in 1186. Suddenly, only his brother Richard and his nephew Arthur were ahead of him in line to the throne.While Richard The Lionheart was away crusading, it was an open question of who would succeed him if things went south for the warrior king. Arthur was the son of Johns elder brother Geoffrey and, according to primogeniture inheritance, he had the stronger claim. However, he was still only a young child. The realities of child kingship being what they were, John was able to convince and strong-arm his way to being named as the heir apparent.Then, on a fateful day in 1199, a crossbow bolt struck down Richard in France. Suddenly, the man who was so far away from the throne for much of his life, found himself being anointed with the holy oil and crowned king of England.SoftswordArthur I of Britain doing homage to Philip II Augustus of France, 14th century. Source: British LibraryJohn inherited Richards war in France against the formidable King Philip II Augustus. It is important to remember that at this point England controlled much of the west of modern-day France. It had been a long-term project of Philip Augustus to regain control over the lands he saw as rightly his. However, rather than continue to fight over his French lands, John sought to make peace.In 1200 the treaty of Le Goulet was signed, bringing an end to the open hostilities between the two realms. The war ended on terms that were seen as more favorable to Philip than they were to John. John received recognition that he was the rightful heir to Richard over Arthur and Philip gained a promise that the traditional Plantagenet policy of encircling France through alliances with neighboring realms would cease and that Philip was formally recognized as the true feudal overlord of Johns French lands.Signing an unfavorable treaty rather than continuing the war earned John the nickname of Softsword. This was a not-so-subtle dig at Johns perceived lack of military prowess but also his masculinity. The medieval world had a much different relationship to war than we do in the modern world but even today leaders can be seen as weak when signing treaties and resolving issues diplomatically.The Disappearance of ArthurKing John hunting, 14th century. Source: The British LibraryArthur led a rebellion against his uncle to press his claim to the throne but was ultimately unsuccessful in his attempt. After his defeat and capture by John, the fate of Arthur of Brittany becomes murky. It is not known for sure what happened to him, but rumors abound that there was foul play.In the Annales De Margan, John is alleged to have gone to see Arthur after dinner the Thursday before Easter. John had been drinking heavily and was quite drunk. The chronicle is sparse on specific detail but it says that John became possessed by the Devil and slew Arthur with his own hand. Then, he tied a heavy stone to the body and dumped the boys body in the Seine River, only for it to be discovered by a fisherman sometime later.Did this actually happen? The only person who knew for sure was John, and he didnt write on the matter. However, one can see how it might have occurred. Arthur was a threat to Johns power. Hed already rebelled once and as he had a strong claim to be the rightful heir there was a chance it could happen again. On a more speculative, personal level, Arthur was beloved by the people of Brittany. Perhaps, if John really did drunkenly wander down to Arthurs cell that fateful night, jealous rage guided his hand rather than the calculated removal of a political rival.TaxationBattle between Philip II August and John Lackland, 14th century. Source: The British LibraryIn 1204, after a series of devastating military campaigns by Philip II, John lost control of Normandy, Anjou, and Poitouthe majority of his holdings on the mainland. This was a loss to Johns prestige as well as his treasury. He wanted to regain the rich lands he had lost but war was very expensive and he would need an enormous amount of money to be able to raise the army he needed to do so. After 1204, he turned his royal power toward extracting as much money as possible from his vassals and subjects.One of the main areas that John had direct control over was royal forests. Use of these required royal approval, and they were governed under forestry law. John hiked up the fees associated with gaining approval to use forest lands and raised the penalties for those caught illegally using the forests to extortionate amounts. One of the reasons that Sherwood Forest plays a large part in the Robin Hood legend is precisely due to the impact of forestry laws on the general population.Portrait of King John, 1620. Source: Wikimedia CommonsScutage was a tax that could be levied on nobles and knights as a substitute for military service. John utilized this tax eleven times during his 17-year reign. As a point of comparison, scutage had been utilized only eleven times over the preceding 40 years. The noblemen hated this constant imposition. Johns brother and father had been politically astute enough to know that imposing too many taxes too fast would be counter-productive but John didnt have the same sense the rest of his family did.John, still needing more money, imposed a 13% tax on all goods within the country. This was an unprecedented expansion of royal power. Never before in English history had a king imposed a tax on nobles and commoners alike. The burden of taxation created a simmering resentment against the king across the land.Papal SanctionsPope Innocent III, 13th century fresco, photo by Carlo Raso. Source: FlickrJohn continued to make everyone who mattered angry at him when the Archbishop of Canterbury died in 1205. Johns preferred candidate was loyal to him, but word came from Pope Innocent III in Rome that Stephen Langton was to be appointed to the archbishops throne in Canterbury. Like many secular rulers in the Middle Ages before and after him, John bristled at being told who to appoint to such an important position and he refused.Unfortunately for John, Innocent III was perhaps one of the most formidable occupants of the chair of St Peter in the long history of the Papacy. The project of his pontificate was to increase his control over all aspects of the Church and to place popes firmly above kings in the power structure of the medieval world. Innocent would not tolerate such insolence from John, and in retaliation, he not only excommunicated the king but placed the entirety of England under Interdict.As long as the interdict remained in effect Johns subjects could not attend mass, could not receive sacraments, and could not bury their dead in churchyards. Services deemed absolutely essential such as baptism and the last rites for the dying were permitted but the greatly reduced spiritual life of England would have been keenly felt by those affected.In this calamity though, John saw opportunity. Like a 13th-century Henry VIII, he confiscated vast sums of wealth from the churches that sat empty and unused, infuriating priests and monks. When John finally relented and submitted to papal authority, six long years had passed.Magna CartaThe Magna Carta (originally known as the Charter of Liberties), 1215. Source: The British LibraryAfter years of ruinous taxation, John finally had enough money to launch a campaign to retake the lands he lost in 1204. However, disaster struck when he suffered a decisive defeat at the Battle of Bouvines in 1214. Following the defeat, the nobility of England had had enough of John. He had nothing to show for his trampling of feudal custom in his quest for more money. In 1215 the barons demanded that John sign a document known as Magna Carta (Great Charter in Latin) that would reign in his power.The Magna Carta is remembered today for clauses 39 and 40.(39) No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land.(40) To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice.However, much of the rest of the document is related more to protection of feudal rights from royal overreach than lofty ideals about justice and the rule of law. Those drawing up the Magna Carta were concerned with protecting themselves from Johns tyrannical rule.When John immediately wriggled out of having to obey the Magna Carta thanks to intervention from, of all people, Pope Innocent III, the barons rose up in rebellion against John. They went so far as to invite the French prince Louis to land in England and take the throne for himself.Johns reign ended in the midst of that catastrophic rebellion. In 1216 John died of dysentery, putting an end to 13 years of turmoil. He was succeeded by his nine-year-old son Henry.The VerdictHerbert Beerbhom Tree as King John, by Charles A Buchel, 1900. Source: The Folger Shakespeare LibraryWhen looking at a historical figure that is almost universally reviled, it is always good to examine the bias of the sources. During the Medieval Period, much of the history was written by churchmen, which can be problematic for historians when the subject they were writing about was actively hostile to the Church. It can be argued that Johns terrible reputation is due in large part to his six-year feud with the pope, leaving the Church in England reeling and much of their wealth confiscated.While there may be an argument for exaggerations of Johns own personal moral failings, it is hard to look at the objective facts of Johns reign and come to a conclusion other than that he was a bad king. He managed not only to lose a huge chunk of his land to the French but was then so egregious in his collection of taxes that his own nobles preferred to invite a foreign prince to take his throne rather than suffer his incompetence and tyranny any longer.Being a medieval king was a delicate balancing act. Kings had to weigh their own needs against the needs of their nobility, the clergy, other royal houses, and even other members of their own families. It was a difficult job at the best of times. John certainly found himself up against some of the toughest challenges the Medieval Period could throw at a monarch, and he was found wanting.Bad King John certainly seems to deserve the moniker. He proves that one does not need to be great to change history. Monumental incompetence can be just as powerful a force for change.

The Aztec Empire is among the most talked about Mesoamerican societies. The prominent empire spanned between 1325 and 1521 CE and covered a significant portion of the modern-day regions of central and southern Mexico. While historians refer to the inhabitants as the Aztecs, they did not use this term to refer to themselves. Instead, they called themselves the Mexica. That said, the Aztec Empire utilized a mix of military might and diplomatic deliberations to maintain control over its vast territories.The Rise of the Aztec EmpireCelebrations held for the coronation of emperor Moctezuma II of Mexico in the Durn Codex, 1579. Source: Bibliotexa Digital HispanicaThe Aztec Empire rose in 1428 under the leadership of Itzcoatl. This was after the community formed an alliance with the Tacubans and Texcocans to defeat the Tepanecs, their most formidable rivals in the region. Montezuma was Itzcoatls successor. He took over leadership in 1440 and was revered as a great warrior. Today, he is widely regarded as the father of the Aztec Empire.The Aztecs expansion model allowed the empire to rule over 500 small states by the early 1500s. Its population is estimated to have been between 5 and 6 million people at its height with Tenochtitln, its biggest city, having about 140,000 inhabitants. That said, the Aztec civilization also had highly developed social structures. Its society was based on a strict caste system made up of nobles at the top and slaves and serfs at the bottom.The Aztec Empire and Its Vast TerritoriesMap of Tenochtitlan from Nuremberg. Source: Library of the University of British ColumbiaWhile the Aztec Empire grew due to its conquest of neighboring regions, the expansion came at a cost. This is because the Aztec military gained power by adding men supplied by allied and defeated states. The large numbers of warriors allowed the Aztecs to easily subdue their enemies and gain new territory. With each victory, Aztec rulers demanded payment from defeated populations and took prisoners back to Tenochtitln to be used as human religious sacrifices. The religious sacrifices angered other tribes and caused numerous uprisings. Although Montezuma squashed many of the rebellions, the constant conflicts weakened the empire.This problem enabled Spanish invaders led by Hernn Cortes to form partnerships with other native people, most notably the Tlaxcalans, who were enemies of the Aztecs. The Tlaxcalan army contributed to the Aztecs downfall by helping Cortes attack the Aztecs.European Invasion of the Aztec EmpireThe Meeting of Corts and Montezuma by Unknown, ca. 1650. Source: The Library of CongressThe first European to visit Mexican territory was Francisco Hernandez de Cordoba. He arrived in Yucatan from Cuba with several ships and about 100 men in early 1517. Cordobas accounts of the Aztec region on his return to Cuba are believed to have compelled Diego Velasquez, the Spanish governor, to send a large contingent of soldiers back to Mexico under the command of Hernn Cortes. Subsequently, in March 1519, Cortes arrived at the town of Tabasco with about 500 soldiers. It was while there when he learned from the natives about the great Aztec Empire ruled by Moctezuma II.After the Spaniards gained the support of the local Indians, Cortes was able to create a base at La Villa Rica de la Vera Cruz, now Veracruz, Mexico. He then moved west toward the Aztec capital. Initially, the Spaniards were welcomed and met with gifts from Montezuma. However, Cortes intention was to take over Tenochtitln due to its gold and rich economy.The Empires DownfallArtists rendering of the Templo Mayor in Tenochtitlan, unknown artist, 1900. Source: Wikimedia CommonsUnfortunately for the Aztec people, the Spanish invaders brought with them some deadly diseases when they arrived such as smallpox, and the Aztecs had no resistance to many of the European diseases. As a result, smallpox spread among the indigenous people and with time devastated the population. It is estimated that half of Tenochtitlns inhabitants died from the disease.Illustration of smallpox from Dr. John D. Fishers Description of the Distinct, Confluent, and Inoculated Small Pox, Varioloid Disease, Cox Pox, and Chicken Pox, 1836. Source: Connecticut Explored or Google BooksAs such, when the Spanish first attacked the Aztecs in February 1519 following a series of misunderstandings, the kingdom was greatly weakened. The lack of superior weaponry also contributed to the downfall of the Aztec Empire. While the Aztecs outnumbered the Spaniards, their weapons were no match for Spanish arms. The Spaniards possessed guns and cannons while the Aztec warriors fought using wooden shields, bows, and spears. The situation put the Aztecs at a great disadvantage in times of conflict.Eventually, Cortes made Montezuma his prisoner and forced him into the role of a puppet king. Montezuma later on died in captivity on June 29, 1520. The Spanish led by Cortes shut down the Aztec resistance on August 13, 1521. About 240,000 people are believed to have died in the Battle of Tenochtitlan which ended the Aztec Empire. After his victory, Cortes burned down Tenochtitlan and built Mexico City where the city once stood.

Looking forward to playing something new this weekend? If so, there's one multiplayer game on PC that's currently available for free for a limited time that might fit the bill.

Pig.dev was working on a problem that could have been revolutionary: agent tech for controlling Windows desktops.

Potty training a dog can be a challenging but rewarding process. At DogingtonPost, we understand the importance of establishing good habits early on.Our comprehensive guide offers essential tips for potty training a dog, helping you navigate this crucial stage of pet ownership. Well cover effective methods, common challenges, and practical solutions to ensure success.How to Understand Your Dogs Potty NeedsRecognizing Potty SignalsDogs communicate their need to relieve themselves through various signals. These can include sniffing, circling, or whining. If your puppy suddenly becomes restless, pacing back and forth or unable to settle down, it could be a sign that they need to go potty. Pay close attention to these cues, especially after your dog has eaten, drunk water, or woken up from a nap.Selecting the Ideal Potty SpotPick a specific area outside for your dogs bathroom breaks. This spot should be easily accessible and away from high-traffic areas in your yard. Consistency is key always take your dog to this designated spot when its time to go. This helps your dog associate the area with the act of elimination, making potty training more efficient.Establishing a Potty ScheduleCreate a regular feeding and potty routine. Puppies typically need to relieve themselves within 15-30 minutes after eating or drinking. Adult dogs may have more control, but still benefit from a consistent schedule. In general, a puppy can wait one hour per month of life between hygiene breaks. So by the time Puppo is 89 months, they should be able to last the night.Implementing Positive ReinforcementReward your dog immediately after theyve done their business in the right spot. Use high-value treats, enthusiastic praise, or a favorite toy. This positive association encourages your dog to repeat the desired behavior. Be quick with your praise dogs have a short memory span for associating actions with consequences.The American Kennel Club suggests that consistency in rewards is essential for successful potty training. They found that dogs trained with positive reinforcement methods learned faster and retained their training better than those trained with punishment-based methods.Handling AccidentsAccidents will happen. When they do, clean the area thoroughly with an enzymatic cleaner to remove all traces of odor. This prevents your dog from being drawn back to the same spot for future accidents.Potty training requires patience and persistence. Some dogs may learn quickly, while others may take several weeks or even months to fully grasp the concept. Stay consistent with your approach, and youll soon have a well-trained pup who knows exactly where to do their business.Now that weve covered the basics of understanding your dogs potty needs, lets move on to explore effective potty training methods that can help streamline this process.Proven Potty Training TechniquesPotty training your dog requires a combination of patience, consistency, and effective methods. We have compiled a list of proven techniques that have helped countless dog owners successfully potty train their furry friends.Crate Training: A Safe Haven for LearningCrate training has several benefits, including giving your dog their own safe space, promoting potty-training, and ease in traveling. Choose a crate thats just large enough for your dog to stand, turn around, and lie down comfortably. Any larger, and they might use one end as a bathroom.Introduce your dog to the crate gradually. Make it a positive experience by placing treats and toys inside. Once your dog feels comfortable, use the crate for short periods during the day and at night. Take your dog out to their designated potty area immediately after letting them out of the crate.Paper Training: A Stepping Stone to Outdoor SuccessPaper training can benefit apartment dwellers or serve as a solution during inclement weather. Start by covering a small area with puppy pads or newspapers. Reduce the covered area as your dog becomes more reliable. When your dog uses the paper, offer immediate praise and treats.However, paper training can sometimes confuse dogs about appropriate elimination spots. It works best as a temporary solution or for dogs that will eventually use an indoor potty area.Bell Training: Teaching Your Dog to CommunicateBell training involves placing a bell or button near the door that you use most frequently to take your dog out to potty. Every time youre taking your dog out, use their paw to ring the bell. Say a command like outside or potty as you do this.Your dog will learn to associate the bell with going outside to potty. Theyll start ringing it on their own when they need to go out.Frequent Outdoor Trips: Establishing a RoutineTake your dog outside frequently, especially after meals, naps, and playtime. Puppies typically need to go out every 1-2 hours (depending on their age). Adult dogs can usually hold it longer, but still benefit from regular outdoor breaks.Use a consistent command (such as go potty) each time you take your dog to their designated spot. This helps them associate the phrase with the action.Positive Reinforcement: Rewarding SuccessReward your dog immediately after theyve done their business in the right spot. Use high-value treats, enthusiastic praise, or a favorite toy. This positive association encourages your dog to repeat the desired behavior.The key to success with any potty training method is consistency. Stick to your chosen technique, and youll see results. If you encounter challenges along the way, dont hesitate to seek advice from a professional dog trainer or your veterinarian. In the next section, well address common potty training hurdles and provide practical solutions to overcome them.Overcoming Common Potty Training HurdlesDealing with AccidentsAccidents occur during potty training. If you catch your dog in the act, interrupt them with a firm No and take them to their designated potty area immediately. Praise them lavishly once they finish there.For accidents you discover later, clean the area thoroughly with an enzymatic cleaner. Products like Natures Miracle and Bissell Pet Stain Eliminator are effective options. These cleaners break down odor-causing proteins (reducing the likelihood of your dog returning to the same spot). Avoid ammonia-based cleaners, as their scent can attract dogs back to the area.Submissive Urination: A Behavioral ChallengeSubmissive urination is a behavioral issue, not a potty training problem. It often occurs when a dog feels intimidated or overly excited. To address this:Keep greetings low-key. Avoid direct eye contact and speak in a calm, quiet voice.Reward calm behavior. This encourages your dog to remain composed during interactions.Build your dogs confidence through positive training experiences and socialization.If the problem persists, consult with a professional dog behaviorist for tailored advice.Separation Anxiety and Potty ProblemsSeparation anxiety can lead to accidents when youre away. To mitigate this:Practice short departures. Leave for just a few minutes at first, gradually increase the duration.Dont make a big fuss when leaving or returning home. This helps normalize your comings and goings.Provide engaging toys or puzzles to keep your dog occupied while youre gone.Consider using a dog camera to monitor your pets behavior and identify triggers.For severe cases, speak with your veterinarian about potential anti-anxiety medications or treatments. Counterconditioning can also be effective, focusing on developing an association between being alone and good things, like delicious food.Nighttime Potty ManagementNighttime accidents are common, especially with puppies. To manage this:Consistency is key in overcoming these challenges. Stay patient and positive, and youll see progress. If you struggle, dont hesitate to seek help from a professional trainer or your veterinarian. They can provide personalized strategies based on your dogs specific needs and behaviors.Final ThoughtsPotty training a dog requires dedication, patience, and consistency. You must recognize your dogs potty signals, establish a designated area, and maintain a consistent schedule. Positive reinforcement plays a vital role reward your dog generously for correct behavior.We explored various effective methods, including crate training, paper training, and bell training. Each approach has merits, and you might find a combination works best for your situation. Dont feel discouraged by setbacks; accidents are part of the learning process (clean them thoroughly and persist).For more tips for potty training a dog and expert advice on all aspects of dog care, visit DogingtonPost. We provide the latest information and resources to help you become the best dog parent possible. With patience and the right approach, you and your furry companion will navigate the potty training process successfully.