• YUBNUB.NEWS
    How Trump, Bidens Arms Shipments Differ: NATO Pays 100% for Ukraine
    Though endlessly critical of his predecessor, President Trump has adopted a Ukraine strategy similar to that of former President Joe Biden: Arm the Ukrainians to the teeth and threaten Russian President
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 23 Visualizações
  • YUBNUB.NEWS
    Californias State of Decay
    Conservative criticism of California focuses, with good reason, on the perils of progressive ideology. The dysfunction caused by progressives in power is evident in the states dismal system of public
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 23 Visualizações
  • YUBNUB.NEWS
    Toddler Assault Charges Filed at Western Sydney Childcare Centre
    Illustration - New Africa/ShutterstockTwo employees at a South Wentworthville childcare facility in Western Sydney have been charged following allegations they assaulted a 17-month-old boy in their care.Police
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 35 Visualizações
  • YUBNUB.NEWS
    Latham Responds to Abuse Allegations, Calls AVO Claims Comical
    Independent MP Mark Latham speaks to media in Bankstown, Sydney, Australia, on Jan. 20, 2023. AAP Image/Dan HimbrechtsIndependent NSW MP and former Labor leader Mark Latham has strongly denied allegations
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 23 Visualizações
  • YUBNUB.NEWS
    India Says Peace at Border, Open Trade, Key to Reset With China
    India's Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar in New Delhi on Jan. 25, 2023. Sajjad Hussain/AFP via Getty ImagesIndias foreign minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar called on China to resolve longstanding
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 35 Visualizações
  • 15 Times the Ocean Gave Up Its Oldest Secrets
    15 Times the Ocean Gave Up Its Oldest Secrets - History Collection 8. Sunken City of Dwarka The underwater city. Photo courtesy: cdn.earthporm Source: Make Heritage Fun In 2002, Indian and international teams led by the National Institute of Oceanography confirmed submerged ruins off the Gujarat coast date back approximately 9,500 years. Divers uncovered stone...
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 166 Visualizações
  • 15 Dark Facts About Adelicia Acklen: Tennessee’s Wealthiest Woman Who Sold Plantations to Build a Prison
    15 Dark Facts About Adelicia Acklen: Tennessee’s Wealthiest Woman Who Sold Plantations to Build a Prison - History Collection 2. Heiress to Two Major Fortunes Detail from an 1836 anti-slavery broadside. Original caption: “Franklin & Armfield’s Slave Prison.” Franklin and Armfield were a Alexandria, Virginia slave trading firm. Source: Wikipedia Adelicia...
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 173 Visualizações
  • WWW.THECOLLECTOR.COM
    How Hagia Sophia Survived Centuries of Religious and Political Change
    Hagia Sophia was built in the 6th century under the Byzantine Empire. Minarets were added to the exterior in the 15th century. Minarets Source: Mehmet Cetin.Rising at the crossroads of Europe and Asia, Hagia Sophia is more than a marvel of architecture. For over 1,500 years, Istanbuls international treasure has witnessed the rise and fall of empires and the shifting tides of faith. How did a singular structure survive centuries of political and religious upheaval? The secret to Hagia Sophias longevity lies in its unparalleled adaptability.From Imperial Church to Enduring Edifice: The Byzantine Foundations of Hagia SophiaThe Theotokos mosaic inside Hagia Sophia depicts the Virgin Mary and Christ Child and dates back to the Byzantine Empire (c. 9th century CE). Source: World History Encyclopedia.Hagia Sophia was originally built as the imperial cathedral of the Byzantine Empire in Constantinople. The building was commissioned by Emperor Justinian I and completed in 537 CE. Designed by the architects Anthemius of Tralles and Isidore of Miletus, the building broke new ground with its massive central dome, supported by an innovative pendentive dome, one of the first of its kind and, for a time, the largest in the world.The interior walls of Hagia Sophia were decorated with glittering Byzantine mosaics. Comprising gold, glass, and precious stones, the mosaics depict sacred Christian figures and imperial patrons. They are rich in symbolism and artistic innovation, exemplifying the height of Byzantine iconography. At the time of their creation, they were believed to be a visual embodiment of divine order.Hagia Sophia quickly became the beating heart of Eastern Orthodox Christianity. It served as a center for ceremony, coronation, and spiritual authority. While the building endured early challenges, including earthquakes and riots, its symbolic and political importance ensured repeated restoration over the centuries.The Ottoman Era: Preservation Through TransformationIn the 19th century, large calligraphic roundels were added to the buildings interior. They display, in Arabic, names and religious phrases important to Islam. Source: A. Savin/Wikimedia Commons.When Constantinople fell to the Ottoman Empire in 1453, Sultan Mehmed II converted Hagia Sophia into a mosque. This act was both strategic and symbolic in nature. By preserving the Byzantine Empires most iconic building and layering Islamic identity over its Christian roots, the Sultan claimed both political power and spiritual legitimacy.The Ottomans began adding minarets, towers from which the Muslim call to prayer is issued, to the exterior of Hagia Sophia. Interior additions, including a mihrab (prayer niche) and minbar (pulpit), allowed the building to function fully as a mosque. The earlier Christian mosaics were plastered over instead of destroyed. In the 19th century, during a major restoration under Sultan Abdulmejid I, artists added the now-iconic calligraphic medallions to the interior of Hagia Sophia. These bear the names of Allah, the Prophet Muhammad, and the first four caliphs in Arabic.A Symbol of Modernity: The Museum PhaseHagia Sophia, photographed shortly after the Turkish government made it a museum in 1935. Source: Wikimedia Commons.The Ottoman Empire officially dissolved in 1922, following defeat in World War I and years of internal decline. This paved the way for the founding of the modern Turkish Republic under Mustafa Kemal Atatrk. As part of Atatrks sweeping reforms, Hagia Sophia was secularized, reopening as a museum in 1935.The buildings designation as a museum enabled the uncovering and careful restoration of Christian mosaics. At the same time, Ottoman elementssuch as the calligraphy and minbarwere preserved. This visual dialogue between faiths has since become one of Hagia Sophias most powerful legacies. In 1985, it was named a UNESCO World Heritage site for its international value, both architecturally and culturally.Navigating the Present: Reconversion and Renewed DialoguePeople gather to celebrate the reconversion of Hagia Sophia into a mosque in 2020. Source: Ozan Kose/AFP.In 2020, Hagia Sophia returned to the spotlight when the Turkish government reconverted it into a mosque. The decision reignited debate over the buildings legacy and its future in a world shaped by religious and political tensions. Despite initial controversy, public access to the building remains open, with Muslim prayer services and historical visits occurring in parallel.Now, after over 1,500 years, Hagia Sophia stands as a living archive of civilizations and traditions, marked by emperors, sultans, and secular reformers. From mosaics to minarets, Hagia Sophia carries the imprints of multiple empires and faiths, even as the world continues to shift around it.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 37 Visualizações
  • WWW.THECOLLECTOR.COM
    Get to Know Venerable Bede, the Father of English History
    Bede is remembered today chiefly as a historian. Yet he was a dynamic intellectual giant in the Early Middle Ages and his most famous historical work is far more than a dry recounting of events. Let us explore Bede, his History, and the influence that it has had.Northumbria in the Age of Venerable BedeThe kingdom of Northumbria in pre-conquest Britain. Source: Wikimedia CommonsBede is frequently labeled as the father of English history. As we will see, he had a clear conception of an English people living within the British Isles. Yet the Anglo-Saxons were at this time split into various kingdoms. Bede was from Northumbria, the kingdom encompassing the northeast of modern England and the southeast of modern Scotland, which was itself internally composed of a southern realm called Deira and a northern realm, Bernicia.In the late 7th and early 8th century, the kingdom of Northumbria was in the middle of a golden age. Though in the European sense a backwater, the kingdom was producing art, texts, and people that are still at the core of the modern northeastern identity. It was a world in which Christianity, a relatively new religion among the Anglo-Saxons, was spurring new forms of expression and thought, centered on the monastic institutions being founded there. Bede was born into this world, in around the year 673. But to understand Bede and his world it is apt to begin with the life of another monk of the northeast.St Peters church in Wearmouth, on the site of one of the twin monasteries founded by Biscop. Source: National ChurchesBenedict Biscop founded the monasteries of Wearmouth and Jarrow, where Bede would spend his entire adult life. Biscop was born in around 628 and after deciding to become a monk he traveled frequently to the continent where he soaked up the culture of the Roman Church. Biscop became determined to infuse continental Christianity into a monastic foundation of his own. Thus he imported stonemasons from Francia to build his monastic house in the 670s and brought over books, relics, calendars, and people from the continent to fill the monastery.Biscop founded the monasteries of Wearmouth and Jarrow, around 10 miles apart, as joint houses and they would remain conjoined through the time of Bede. Most of what we know of Biscop comes from the account of his life written by Bede himself, and it seems clear that Bede held Biscop in great reverence, for Bedes ability to become the intellectual giant that he was rested on foundations laid by the founder of his monastery.Northumbria was also home to the monastery of Lindisfarne, which was one of the most renowned Christian houses in all of Europe. Lindisfarne was associated with the monks Aidan, its founder, and Cuthbert, two deeply influential holy men whose aestheticism and reported miracles resounded across Christendom. The Lindisfarne Gospels, a richly decorated manuscript, was made on the island monastery in around 700 and remains one of the most revered pieces of art from early medieval Europe.Thus although Bede grew up in the remote northern reaches of an obscure island off the European continent, Northumbrian Christian centers were flowering in his time. He was part of a sophisticated religious and intellectual community that spanned across Europe, even though there is no evidence that he ventured far from his monastery in Northumbria at any time in his life.Bede and His Ecclesiastical HistoryThe opening page from a manuscript of Bedes History, 800-950 CE. Source: The British LibraryBede himself tells us the few details we know of his life. He entered the monastery of Wearmouth-Jarrow at the age of seven, in around 680. Plague swept through the monastery in 685, leaving a young Bede as one of the few survivors, though the community soon revived. He noted being ordained a deacon at the age of 19 and a priest at 30. For the most part, Bede is a mystery to us, despite being by far the most prolific writer of his time in the British Isles.To access Bede we must turn from the sparse biographical details we have and look at the works that he left behind. By far his most famous work, and that which has earned him his title as the father of English history, is his Historia Ecclesiastica Gentis Anglorum, or Ecclesiastical History of the English People. Marc Morris in his book The Anglo-Saxons labels this as without question the single most important and influential work of the whole Anglo-Saxon period.Depiction of Bede, 12th-century manuscript. Source: E-CodicesThe work constitutes a history from the time of Caesars invasion up to around 731, the year in which he completed the text. Yet Bede does not attempt to write a meticulous account of every noteworthy event in between these dates. History as we understand it, the modern scholarly discipline, was alien to this period. A work of history would always have a purpose beyond the accurate recording of events, a certain narrative that the author sought to put forward. For Bede, his work portrayed the Anglo-Saxons as a people chosen by God to become converted to Christianity and brought into the fold of the universal church. The coming of the Anglo-Saxons to Britain, their conversion to the Christian faith, and the establishment of the Roman Church in their kingdoms are the core of Bedes narrative.Bede himself in a preface to the Ecclesiastical History, dedicated the work to King Ceolwulf of Northumbria, and stated that history was important in allowing people in the present to imitate the good actions of good men of the past. He thought that this was especially so when history focused on men of our own race thus his work was in many ways intended to be instructional, containing local stories to help guide people toward actions that carried divine approval. His desire to embed local stories and fables into his narrative can often make his work difficult for modern readers to interpret when searching purely for historical facts.The Content of the HistoryThe missionary Augustine preaching to King Aethelbert of Kent, 1864. Source: Wikimedia CommonsPart of what makes Bedes Ecclesiastical History so important is that it provides a detailed account of a period of history in Britain where there is an otherwise severe lack of sources. Though Bede certainly had a particular narrative in mind, he did not neglect to provide details of important eventsboth religious and otherwisethat occurred in the 7th and 8th centuries.Without Bede, our understanding of the early Anglo-Saxon Period would be severely curtailed, and the period would lose much of the color and the life that Bede brought to it through his history. He particularly illuminates Northumbria, his homeland. Most of the individuals who received the most detailed narrative and praise in Bedes history, such as King Oswald and Queen Aethelthryth, and the monks Aidan and Cuthbert, were active in Northumbria.Bede tells us of the coming of Roman Christianity to the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms through the missionary Augustine in 597 and follows the progress of this mission closely. He includes in his work letters sent between Pope Gregory the Great and Augustine as they discuss how to approach the evangelization of the Anglo-Saxons. He documents the rise and fall of various Northumbrian kings including Aethelfrith, Edwin, Oswy, and the saintly Oswald, whose dramatic story from exile to triumph on the battlefield to the foundation of the monastery of Lindisfarne Bede regales with clear admiration. He tells the legendary tale of the coming of the first Anglo-Saxons to Britain, and the conversion to Christianity of the king of Kent, Aethelbert, and the Northumbrian king, Edwin.Saint Oswald, as king of Northumbria, 12th century. Source: Wikimedia CommonsBede also introduces us to otherwise unknown concepts in Anglo-Saxon history. An example is what was later referred to as a bretwalda, a succession of kings whom Bede states ruled over all the southern kingdoms south of the River Humber. Later works of history from the pre-conquest period, such as the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, based almost all their history on the 6th, 7th, and 8th-century sections off of Bede.Yet for all its appeal as a historical work, there is much in Bedes text that distances him from modern readers. He is interested in miracles and spends much time in the Ecclesiastical History detailing miracles that were said to have been performed by saints and their relics. He is also deeply preoccupied with the calculation of Easter, and specifically the dispute between the Irish and Roman churches as to the correct calculation of Easter, which he spends much time detailing. His account of the Synod of Whitby in 664, at which King Oswy of Northumbria chose to follow the practices of the Roman church over the Irish church (including in the calculation of Easter day), is one of the most memorable scenes in the Ecclesiastical History.Bedes bias against the native Britons and their practice of Christianity is also evident they act as the immoral, backward peoples against whom the Anglo-Saxons triumph and dominate in Bedes narrative.A National Identity?The Anglo-Saxon incursions into post-Roman Britain, 400-500. Source: Wikimedia CommonsAn interesting and novel aspect of Bedes Ecclesiastical History is the extent to which it can be seen as an early form of nationalist history. Bede predates ideas of nationalism in the modern sense by at least a millennia, yet there are aspects of the Ecclesiastical History that point towards a nationalistic understanding of the gens Anglorum.Bede is the first author to really establish the notion of the Germanic invaders that came to Britain in the post-Roman age as a single people. Through detailing the various Anglo-Saxon kingdoms, Bede understands the people who make up these kingdoms to have some kind of common ancestry he calls them the gens Anglorum or the Angles, the word from which we get England and the English.Angle refers to the area in the south of the Jutland peninsula encompassing the south of modern-day Denmark and the north of modern Germany where large numbers of the Germanic peoples who came to Britain originated. Bede sees the English people as united through their new-found Christianity and devotion, and makes clear distinctions between the English and the native Britons.The Anglo-Saxons and Britons, c. 600 CE. Source: Wikimedia CommonsAs a result, Bede can be viewed as something of a foundation stone for the concept of an English national identity, and this perception is strengthened by the detail and color of his History, which brings the British Isles to life for the first time since the Roman occupation.Bedes conception of the Anglo-Saxons as a chosen people is clearly influenced by his reading of the Old Testament. The migration of the Jews into Canaan, a promised land, and their devotion to the Law of God following Mosess experience on Mount Sinai and their subsequent conquest of Israel through Gods divine favor was surely an inspiration for Bedes narrative. This reminds us that although the image of Bede most commonly held today is of a historian and a Northumbrian, he was above all a Christian.More generally, Bedes history carries a deeply influential concept, which is that the past contains fables, messages, and lessons from which those in the present can learn. History for Bede lacked purpose when viewed as simply a sequence of events. History was animated by the divine lessons that ran through it, and the role of the historian, for Bede, was to extract these expressions of divine will and present them to the reader.This did not mean that truth and accuracy did not matter. Bede was keen to stress that his work was based on reliable and trustworthy accounts. But truth and accuracy were not ends in themselves, rather they helped to strengthen and guide the work. Bedes concept of what history should be continues to influence those who think about the past.Bede Beyond the HistoryA manuscript image of a medieval scribe, Life of Saint Cuthbert, by Bede, 12th-century copy. Source: British LibraryA look over the total sum of Bedes literary output will show that his interests ranged far and wide, but all shared a common theological tilt. The majority of his surviving worksaround 40 in allare biblical commentaries and hagiographies, while the only other history that he wrote detailed the lives of the former Abbots of Wearmouth and Jarrow monasteries.Seen against this backdrop then, the Ecclesiastical History is not an aberration from Bedes usual focus on biblical study but rather a deeply Christian work that takes its place alongside his other works as forming part of his Christian framework for understanding history and time. Though Cuthbert does play a large role in the Ecclesiastical History, Bede wrote a separate Life of St Cuthbert which was a hugely influential work in fueling the rise of Cuthberts pre-eminence to become Englands most famous saint before the martyrdom of Thomas Becket. Cuthbert is still regarded as the North of Englands patron saint.Bede was also fascinated by science and mathematics. He wrote about the computation of time and how the lunar cycle impacted the tides. His work On the Reckoning of Time was used throughout the Middle Ages to understand the calendar and to help calculate the date of Easter, related as it was to the full moon. He was keen to utilize observable proofs as well as mathematical reasoning in his work to understand the astronomical cycles that influenced the date of Easter. He also made a new calculation as to the age of the world since the biblical creation. He wrote about the art of poetry and created instructional works on Latin grammar for the education of others.Bede dictating in his old age, by James Doyle Penrose, 1902. Source: Wikimedia CommonsBedes works were influential in their own time. The Anglo-Saxon missionary St Boniface (who played an important role in spreading Christianity throughout Saxony) wrote to the abbot of Wearmouth-Jarrow in the mid-8th century to request copies of Bedes texts. Later in the 8th and early 9th century the monk Alcuin, himself from Northumbria, would do much to spread Bedes works throughout the Carolingian Empire from his position at the court of Charlemagne.Venerable Bedes Death and BurialTomb of the Venerable Bede, Durham Cathedral, photo by Lawrence OP. Source: FlickrIn the year 735 Bede was working on a translation of the Gospel of John into Old English, dictating to a scribe due to his ill health and old age. On the 26th of May, he passed away and was buried at the monastery of Jarrow. After his death, Bede lived on through his works, as the high demand for his texts saw monks at his monastery copying his writings to send throughout the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms and across the continent.There are multiple stories that surround the transfer of Bedes bones from his monastic home to Durham Cathedral. It seems that monks in Durham, a town that began to be built in 995 around the relics of Saint Cuthbert, were keen to attract visitors and pilgrims to the site and thought that Bedes remains would be a major draw. This could have led to an agreement (or indeed thievery) that saw Bedes remains taken to Durham.When the bones of Cuthbert were moved into the newly built Norman Cathedral in 1104, the bones of Bede were discovered within Cuthberts coffin, and the scholar-monk was interred near Cuthbert within the cathedral. Though Bedes shrine was destroyed in the 16th-century Reformation, his tomb can still be visited today.Bedes legacy can be simply put: he is very possibly the most important figure of the Anglo-Saxon Period. This is because he, more than any other individual, has shaped the way we understand the Anglo-Saxons and post-Roman Britain as a whole. It is Bedes understanding of his people and his times that looms over our image of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms and will continue to do so into the future.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 37 Visualizações
  • WWW.THECOLLECTOR.COM
    Real Person or Myth? The Truth About King Arthur
    Did King Arthur really exist? That question has occupied the minds of historians for centuries. Even in the medieval era, as early as the century in which Geoffrey of Monmouth wrote his Arthurian account, scholars doubted the truth behind much of the Arthurian legends. In more recent centuries, the existence of King Arthur himself has been called into question. In recent decades, rejecting his historicity entirely has become a mainstream opinion, although many scholars still hold to his existence. What is the evidence for and against King Arthurs historicity?The Context of King Arthurs Supposed ExistenceStatue of King Arthur at Tintagel. Photo by Caleb HowellsBefore we can analyze the evidence for and against King Arthurs existence, we need to understand the context of his supposed existence. When and where was he supposed to have lived, and who exactly was he supposed to have been?According to the earliest record of his career, Arthur was a war leader who led an alliance of kings in a series of battles against the Anglo-Saxons in the first half of the 6th century. His career followed that of Ambrosius Aurelianus, who fought the Anglo-Saxons in the second half of the 5th century. The record in question, the Historia Brittonum, places the start of Arthurs wars after the accession of Octa to the throne of Kent, which appears to have occurred in c. 512.The series of battles occurred in nine different locations. Scholars debate where they were, but there is general agreement that at least some of them can be placed in the region of Lincolnshire. The Battle of Badon, the location of which is fiercely debated, was the final battle.Reasons for Doubting King Arthurs ExistenceFolio of De Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae, c. 10th century. Source: British LibraryThe primary reason for doubting King Arthurs existence is his general absence from many early records. As we have just seen, the first description of his career comes from the Historia Brittonum, written in c. 830. However, there are records of 6th-century Britain that date from earlier than that. For example, Gildas was a monk from the 6th century who wrote De Excidio, our one surviving record from that era. He wrote about Ambrosius Aurelianus, explained that he started a campaign against the Anglo-Saxons, helping the Britons to organize a proper counter-offensive, and recorded that the Britons and the Saxons exchanged losses and victories for an undisclosed period until the Battle of Badon.Based on this brief description, many scholars feel that Gildas intended to suggest that Ambrosius was the leader of the Britons at the Battle of Badon, leaving no space for Arthur. In any case, Gildas does not mention Arthur at all in his account of Britain from the time of Ambrosius onwards.Folio of the Tiberius Bede manuscript of Bedes Ecclesiastical History, c. 8th century. Source: British LibraryIt is also notable that Arthur does not appear in the writings of Bede. He was an 8th-century English historian. Although he did cover much of the history of the conflicts between the Britons and the Anglo-Saxons, including through the 5th, 6th, and 7th centuries, he never mentions King Arthur.Another relevant source is the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. This was written at the end of the 9th century, just over half a century after the Historia Brittonum. This presents an Anglo-Saxon perspective on the events of the Dark Ages, much like the Historia Brittonum for the Britons, but in the form of a chronicle rather than a narrative.Notably, this chronicle does not mention King Arthur. This is perhaps even more significant than in the case of Bede since the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle is much more detailed. It describes numerous specific battles and conflicts that occurred during the 6th century, and Arthur is not mentioned in any of them.Do These Objections Stand Up to Scrutiny?Entrance of Saint-Gildas-de-Rhuys monastery, dedicated to Gildas, Morbihan, France. Source: GeographAs we can see, it is certainly true that the few early sources that we have for 6th-century Britain do not mention Arthur. Does this, however, really form a sensible basis on which to reject his historicity? Take the case of Gildas. It is true that Gildas does not mention Arthur in his overview of Britain from the time of Ambrosius right through to his own time. However, the significance of this is almost non-existent. Gildas was not writing a history. He was writing a religious tract aimed at criticizing the Britons and their kings and motivating them to take certain actions. Hence, what he included in his summary of British history was carefully chosen for specific reasons.Significantly, the brief overview of history from Ambrosius to his own time occupies only a few lines, and Gildas does not mention any king by name in that short passage. If we were to use this to argue that Arthur did not exist, then we would have to conclude that no king of the Britons existed at all between Ambrosius and the time Gildas was writing. As well as being patently absurd, Gildas own wording shows that such kings did exist in that period.Arthur Leading the Charge at Mount Badon, by George Wooliscroft Rhead and Louis Rhead, 1898. Source: University of RochesterThe only point that is actually worth noting from Gildas is that he does not credit the Battle of Badon to Arthur. However, the idea that he instead credited it to Ambrosius Aurelianus is severely flawed. Modern research suggests that Gildas may have been writing well into the latter half of the 6th century. This is seen from Rachel Bromwichs suggestion regarding the chronology of the reign of Maelgwn, a living king to whom Gildas directed some comments. Gildas placed the Battle of Badon 43 years before the time he was writing, yet Ambrosius was active in the second half of the 5th century. Thus, Ambrosius could not have fought at the Battle of Badon. That being so, it is evident that Gildas simply did not name the victor of the Battle of Badon, and Ambrosius was merely the one who started the campaign that eventually led up to that battle.The fact that Bede did not mention Arthur is irrelevant when we consider the fact that he based that part of his history directly on Gildas account, following him almost word for word. The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, for its part, hardly mentions any British leaders by name in that era. It does not even mention Ambrosius, and we know for sure that he existed.Evidence for King Arthurs Existence From ArchaeologyBird-shaped brooch from the kingdom of Kent, c. early 6th century. Source: Metropolitan Museum of ArtAs we can see, the arguments against Arthurs existence are not particularly substantial. However, is there any evidence actively arguing in favor of his existence? Notably, archaeology appears to demonstrate a reverse migration from Britain in the first half of the 6th century. In other words, archaeology shows that many Anglo-Saxons were actually leaving Britain at that time. This marked a substantial change from the Anglo-Saxon migration into Britain from c. 430 onwards. This period of reversal corresponds to the exact era in which Arthur was said to have been defeating the Saxons in various locations around Britain.This reverse migration is supported by Procopius, the Byzantine historian writing in the middle of the 6th century. He referred to the fact that many Anglos were leaving Britain for the continent. Furthermore, the 11th century Deeds of the Bishops of the Church of Hamburg, by Adam of Bremen, states that many Saxons were taken in by the Frankish king Theuderic I in the early 530s.Evidence for King Arthurs Existence From Personal NamesJesus College MS 20, folio 36r, showing Arthur ap Pedr of Dyfed on the fourth line, Welsh, c. 14th century. Source: Bodleian Library, OxfordThe aforementioned evidence supports the conclusion that the Anglo-Saxons were facing strong opposition in Britain at exactly the time King Arthur was said to have been opposing them. However, is there any evidence that specifically points to there having been a war leader named Arthur in that era?As it happens, the second half of the 6th century saw a surge in the use of the name Arthur by dynasties around Britain. This surge in popularity continued until the first half of the 7th century. For example, there was Arthur ap Pedr of Dyfed. There was also Artuir mac Aedan of Dal Riada. Prior to the time in which King Arthur supposedly existed, the use of the name Arthur was virtually unseen in the records. This strongly suggests that the second half of the 6th century followed an era in which there was a popular figure called Arthur. This would satisfactorily explain its sudden popularity.Did King Arthur Really Exist?King Arthur depicted on a replica of the Round Table, Winchester, c. 13th century. Source: Historic UKIn conclusion, what can we say about King Arthurs existence? Does the evidence support his existence or not? Well, this issue continues to be debated by scholars, but many do hold to the opinion that Arthur likely existed. Part of the evidence for this is seen through archaeology and also through medieval records revealing which names were popular among dynasties at different times.Archaeology shows that there was a reverse migration of Anglo-Saxons from Britain in the first half of the 6th century. This went against the decades-long trend that had existed until that time. Something must have caused this, such as strong opposition from within Britain. Furthermore, the medieval records show that the name Arthur suddenly became popular in the era immediately after Arthur supposedly existed. Taken together, these pieces of evidence could convincingly be used to argue that there was a powerful war leader named Arthur who strongly opposed the Saxons in the first half of the 6th century.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 38 Visualizações