John Hancock, renowned for his prominent signature on the Declaration of Independence, inherited enslaved individuals through his uncle’s estate in Massachusetts. While Hancock himself did not purchase or sell enslaved people, his family’s ownership of enslaved individuals challenges the commonly held image of colonial New England as a region free from slavery (ancestralfindings.com).
Robert E. Lee, the Confederate general, managed and benefited from enslaved labor at Arlington House and other estates. After his father-in-law’s death in 1857, Lee took control of the estate, which included nearly 200 enslaved individuals. To settle debts, he hired out some of them, leading to family separations and increased tensions. In 1859, three enslaved people attempted to escape; upon recapture, Lee ordered them to be whipped, a punishment he later privately denied but did not publicly refute (washingtonpost.com).
Francis Scott Key, renowned for composing “The Star-Spangled Banner,” owned enslaved individuals and defended slaveholders’ rights as an attorney. He was a founding member of the American Colonization Society, advocating for the relocation of free Black people to Africa. Despite his contributions to American patriotism, Key’s legacy is intertwined with the institution of slavery (nps.gov).
Ulysses S. Grant’s early financial stability was intertwined with enslaved labor, particularly through his wife Julia’s family estate, White Haven, in Missouri. During the mid-1850s, Grant managed the 850-acre plantation, which relied on the labor of enslaved individuals. In 1859, he owned an enslaved man named William Jones, whom he emancipated before the Civil War. This period reflects Grant’s complex relationship with slavery, contrasting with his later role in advocating for emancipation during the war (nps.gov).
John Jay, a founding member and first president of the New-York Manumission Society, advocated for the gradual abolition of slavery. Despite his anti-slavery stance, he owned enslaved individuals, reflecting the complex relationship between personal beliefs and economic interests in early America (columbiaandslavery.columbia.edu).
Benjamin Franklin, renowned for his role as a Founding Father and author of “The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin,” initially accumulated wealth and social standing through the ownership and sale of enslaved individuals. In the 1730s, he purchased his first enslaved person, Joseph, and later owned others, including Peter and Jemima. Franklin’s newspaper, the Pennsylvania Gazette, published advertisements for the sale of enslaved people, reflecting his direct involvement in the institution. However, by the late 1750s, Franklin’s perspective shifted. He became an active abolitionist, advocating for the education and integration of African Americans into society. In 1787, he was elected president of the Pennsylvania Abolition Society, and in 1790, he petitioned Congress for the abolition of slavery, marking a significant transformation in his views and actions regarding the institution (archives.gov).
Charles Carroll of Carrollton, the wealthiest signer of the Declaration of Independence, amassed his fortune through extensive plantations that relied heavily on enslaved labor. His Doughoregan Manor in Maryland spanned 10,000 acres and included approximately 300 enslaved individuals. Despite his wealth, Carroll was barred from holding office in Maryland due to his Catholic faith. He later became a leader in the state’s movement for independence (en.wikipedia.org).
Thomas Nelson Jr., a signer of the Declaration of Independence and governor of Virginia, amassed significant wealth through extensive landholdings and enslaved labor. Upon his marriage in 1762, his father, William Nelson, gifted him 20,000 acres and 400 enslaved individuals, establishing him among the colony’s wealthiest planters. During the Revolutionary War, Nelson further expanded his holdings by purchasing 5,400 acres and 400 enslaved people from Lewis Burwell. Facing post-war debts, he sold 120 enslaved individuals in 1788. Nelson’s substantial wealth and resources were integral to his revolutionary activities, underscoring the complex interplay between personal prosperity and the institution of slavery (christs.cam.ac.uk).
James Monroe’s financial stability was closely tied to his plantation, Highland, which depended on the labor of enslaved individuals. Despite his later support for colonization efforts for freed African Americans, Monroe’s wealth and political career were significantly bolstered by the exploitation of enslaved labor at Highland (highland.org).
John C. Calhoun, a prominent political figure and ardent defender of slavery, owned a 900-acre plantation in Fort Hill, South Carolina, where he held approximately 80 enslaved individuals. His substantial wealth and political influence were deeply intertwined with the institution of slavery, which he championed as a “positive good”. Calhoun’s economic prosperity and political career were significantly bolstered by his ownership and defense of enslaved labor (encyclopedia.com).
Zachary Taylor, the 12th President of the United States, amassed significant wealth through his ownership of multiple plantations in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Kentucky, all reliant on enslaved labor. This economic foundation influenced his brief presidency, where he opposed the expansion of slavery into new territories, advocating for their immediate statehood and allowing residents to decide on slavery, a stance that intensified sectional tensions (history.com).
The intertwined legacies of slavery and the reputations of major historical figures underscore the necessity of confronting uncomfortable truths to achieve a more honest historical narrative. Acknowledging these complexities allows for a deeper understanding of the past and its enduring impact on present-day society (time.com).
English
Arabic
Spanish
Portuguese
Deutsch
Turkish
Dutch
Italiano
Russian
Romaian
Portuguese (Brazil)
Greek